Zionism versus the world

As I have said before, Israel’s current long-planned genocidal landgrab – and the complicity of world puppet “leaders” – has fatally exposed the nature of the single global mafia.

The sheer horror of what has been unfolding in Gaza and Syria has, for many of us, swept away any remaining hesitation about condemning the Zionist entity, which for decades has been using the suffering of Jews under Nazism as a shield against criticism of its own murderous activities.

The more that Israel and its supporters scream “anti-semite!” at those expressing their outrage at the brutal slaughter, the more this dishonest instrument of intimidation and censorship loses its power.

And top Zionists are now admitting to their own circles that they have lost control of the narrative, that their propaganda is not working and that Israel is regarded by billions across the world as a criminal state, guilty of serious war crimes.

They don’t put it quite that way, of course!

When Jonathan Greenblatt, head of the notorious Anti-Defamation League, addressed a committee of Israel’s Knesset on January 7, 2025, he referred instead to “an inferno of antisemitism” that just happened to have coincided with 15 months of Zionist terror!

Indeed, his contribution formed part of a session of the Israeli parliament’s Committee for Immigration, Absorption and Diaspora Affairs dedicated to the so-called “rise of global antisemitism”.

Greenblatt was the most prominent of a number of American Zionists who addressed the meeting, as a report by Judah Ari Gross on the eJewishPhilanthropy website reveals.

Greenblatt “admitted failure” in his organization’s efforts to combat the criticism of Israel’s actions since October 2023.

He said: “Nobody likes to admit when they’ve fallen short. I don’t like to lose. I personally hate to lose. However, sometimes we need to acknowledge the reality, and I believe it takes confidence to express humility”.

In a subsequent interview with Jewish Insider, Greenblatt expressed his disappointment that the “woke” phenomenon supported by Zionist networks had worked against them over Gaza.

He told Melissa Weiss: “I think if you’re not stepping back and rethinking, considering the facts, just the facts — how so many allies fled, or at least didn’t stand by us in the way you would have thought — just the fact that in the younger demographic there’s a higher prevalence of antisemitic attitudes than in the older segments of the population.

“If you start to think about the fact that the Jewish community has been very supportive of diversity initiatives, and yet these initiatives, which are supposed to promote inclusion, actually result in the exclusion of Jews”.

https://paulcudenec.substack.com/p/zionism-versus-the-world

Sounds like a line out of Good fellas 'Elon is a Great Friend of Israel'

Netanyahu Defends Elon Musk Salute: 'Elon is a Great Friend of Israel'

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, who accuse anyone with a pulse of "antisemitism" for opposing Israel in any way, have now both come out to defend Elon Musk's salute.

"Elon Musk is being falsely smeared," Netanyahu wrote Thursday on X.

"Elon is a great friend of Israel," he said. "He visited Israel after the October 7 massacre in which Hamas terrorists committed the worst atrocity against the Jewish people since the Holocaust. He has since repeatedly and forcefully supported Israel's right to defend itself against genocidal terrorists and regimes who seek to annihilate the one and only Jewish state. I thank him for this."

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64823

Big Tech’s Empire State: Silicon Valley seeks to run the world using technocracy

Technocracy, a system of scientific management of society, is rising to power, with Silicon Valley as its hub and Big Tech as its driving force.

Key figures such as Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen are prominent technocrats who are shaping the world according to their vision.

The goal of technocracy is to establish a scientific dictatorship, where decisions are made by technical experts, and to micromanage every aspect of society through non-stop surveillance and digital technologies.

The technocratic system promises a utopian existence, but in reality, it would lead to a loss of individual freedom, property rights and the American dream of upward mobility.

Although technocracy primarily focuses on the production and consumption of energy, it goes much deeper than this, writes Jesse Smith.

The following is taken from pages 4 and 5 of The Light, Issue 53, January 2025. The Light is a peopled-funded monthly newspaper of The Light Paper. It is available worldwide to read online and/or order printed copies. Its sister paper is The Irish Light which is distributed throughout Ireland and Northern Ireland but issues are also available to read online.

Big Tech’s Empire State: Silicon Valley Runs the World From Behind the Facade of Politics

By Jesse Smith

Throughout the ages, many self-serving individuals and groups have positioned themselves as rulers, financiers, benefactors, and thought leaders – to steer change towards preferred outcomes.

From the pharaohs of ancient Egypt to the Jacobin and Napoleon-led French Revolution in the late 18th century, societal transformation has been constant, as one form of government replaces another.

We have now arrived at yet another historical inflexion point. The desire for political and economic reconstruction is being demanded globally as the gap between the ultrawealthy and everyone else continues to accelerate.

In recent years, populism has taken flight by inspiring the masses to reject the rule of “the elite” and chart a new course. However, without scrutiny, this movement and its key figures could be just as dangerous as the establishment they are attempting to usurp. In fact, what we are witnessing is not populism in its truest sense but techno-populism, or technocracy, as it has been called since its inception in 1920.

Technocracy can be defined simply as an impersonal and scientific method of managing all aspects of a society. Its primary concerns deal with how energy is produced and used. But it goes much deeper than this.

One of the best explanations can be found in an issue of The Technocrat magazine from September 1937, where it states: “Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population of this continent. For the first time in human history it will be done as a scientific, technical, engineering problem. There will be no place for politics or politicians, finance or financiers, rackets or racketeers.”

https://expose-news.com/2025/01/23/big-techs-empire-state/

More Americans Died Due to COVID 19 Injections Than in WWI, WWII, and the Vietnam War Combined

More Americans died due to COVID 19 injections than in WWI, WWII, and the Vietnam War combined. This simple fact is astounding. There are approximately 38,000 reported deaths from COVID 19 injections in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) system. Based on studies, the under reporting in VAERS can be anywhere from 1 of 30, to 1 of 100 cases reported. This could put the number of Americans murdered via COVID 19 injections at 3.8 million.

In World War I there were approximately 116,516 American military deaths. In World War II there were approximately 405,399 American military deaths. In the Vietnam War there were approximately 58,220 American military deaths. In total, the combined American military deaths from all three wars were 580,135. So even the low end death projections from the COVID 19 injections exceeded the total American military deaths from all three wars. The high end death projections exceed the number of Americans that died in all wars.

It should be pointed out that the death toll from the COVID 19 injections may be much higher. The VAERS statistics are only reports of acute cases early on. In other words, the people dying one, two, or three years later, for instance, from cancer, heart disease, and so on, are not being reported at all. As the years roll on, these deaths will not be reported. Someone dying from complication or disease or disorder, five, ten, or twenty years after being injected, will not likely be attributed to an injection they received years earlier even though that was primary the cause.

We can see this already with people we know. While some recognize that their cancer or other disease or disorder was caused by the injection, others are oblivious to this reality. Imagine the disconnect if the death occurs a decade after being injected.

The only possible way to adequately measure the full devastation of the bioweapon injections impact on humanity is to conduct a comprehensive study of the ‘vaccinated’ and ‘unvaccinated’ and compare all cause mortality of each group as well as prevalence of diseases and disorders in each group. There is a limited window of time to do such a study. Over time the projection of deaths for each year will be adjusted to absorb the increase in deaths due to the shots. This means that even though deaths are increasing each year, there will no longer be excess deaths as the projections have changed. In other words, they will cheat on the projections to accommodate the excess deaths. Also, as time goes on more people will be injured by the shedding. This means that even the disparity between the two groups will dwindle to a degree without cheating on the projections. Since the damage appears does dependent it is likely that the injected will see greater fatalities and more diseases than the uninjected do from the shedding, even as more uninjected get sick and die.

Will there be monuments in the future to the fallen in this campaign of global extermination? Will the victims of this biowarfare campaign be recognized as casualties of war?

https://www.globalresearch.ca/more-americans-died-covid-19-injections-wwi-wwii-vietnam-war-combined/5878034

>>22419710

>Just one delivered promise and some deep state swinging from ropes with transparent accountability

The Inventor of the mRNA Technology, Dr. Robert Malone, Reacts to “Project StarGate” — “I am Blown away…”

“The logic of Mr. Ellison is grossly naive. It’s a concept well over 30 years old and it’s been repeatedly discredited….>

It’s so naive, it wouldn’t make it past the first 5 minutes of diligence of any of the venture capital firms that I had ever presented to, but here it is.”

• He argues that vaccines should not be the solution to cancer — the way cancer should be dealt with is with lifestyle changes including diet.

• He says it’d be nice if they succeeded, he’s cheering for that, but knowing the industry and how they operate, and the Federal Government should be nowhere near this.

• He says it was a monumental failure for Susie Wiles to allow this to happen on Day 2 of his administration.

• Robert says it’s a noble quest that Trump wants to end cancer, “it shows he has a good heart”, but he was hoping Trump learned a few lessons during Covid to not put so much faith in these healthcare technologies.

“Spending big Federal money on a Program like this and highlighting it on the 2nd day of your presidency, that just doesn’t compute. I don’t get it.”

https://x.com/i/status/1882235600406761621

🚨CAUGHT: OPENAI FUNDS AXIOS WHILE OUTLET BLASTS TRUMP

Sam Altman's OpenAI revealed as backer of Axios just as news outlet attacks Trump's immigration policies on religious grounds.

The three-year deal marks OpenAI's first direct control of newsroom operations.

So much for AI neutrality - looks like Altman's checkbook and Axios' headlines are perfectly aligned.

Both companies claim "editorial independence".

https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1882254625333522434

The Pentagon continues its sloppy shopping spree

This week in 'The Bunker': Why prices don't ever come down in the Pentagon; a 'green' nuclear bomber; the Navy's hopeful ship quotas, and more

Five years ago, The Bunker splurged and bought himself a state-of-the-art, 65-inch 4K OLED (don’t ask) television for $4,000. You know, to watch Defense Department briefings on C-SPAN, and things like that. My son just bought a bigger, better set made by the same company for less than $2,000. How come this never happens when the Pentagon goes shopping?

Basically, because the Pentagon is a risk-averse bureaucracy — except when it comes to taking risks promising higher-tech weapons. Then, all bets are off. It is in the Pentagon’s peculiar DNA to reach — and pay for — the stars yet settle for Pluto. It is a chronic condition, and one that won’t be cured until its civilian overlords slice open its corpulent procurement process and cut out the metastasizing tumor that has eluded decades of fist-pounding congressional chemotherapy and bloviating blue-ribbon radiation(PDF).

This is hardly a new problem, as a pair of Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) scholars noted last month. Some argue that the skyrocketing cost of new weapons “is a result of the incredible complexity required to deliver the exquisite performance of modern weapons systems,” Gregory C. Allen and Isaac Goldston said. “Yet, a 2009 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) study found high complexity technology areas like the automotive industry and integrated circuits achieved extraordinary performance improvements with practically zero cost growth.” They cite a shrinking defense industry, too many cost-plus contracts, and the Pentagon’s requirements process(PDF) as key drivers of this costly insanity.

“Our traditional defense industrial base, built on fossilized systems and entrenched processes, is ill-equipped to respond to modern threats,” Michael Bloomberg, chair of the Defense Innovation Board, and retired Marine Commandant David Berger, wrote January 14 in the Washington Post. But they refreshingly refrained from the traditional fix: “Throwing new money at an old problem is not the answer.” Money now being spent on costly legacy weapons, they argue, should be diverted into cheap next-generation arms.

Easier said than done. In 1979, defense industrialist Norman Augustine famously said that the cost of fighter aircraft had increased 10-fold every 20 years since 1910. “In the year 2054, the entire defense budget will purchase just one aircraft,” he predicted. “The aircraft will have to be shared by the Air Force and Navy [three and a half] days each per week except for leap year, when it will be made available to the Marines for the extra day.”

The Defense Department’s new uncrewed Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA)(PDF) program is supposed to harness new ways to develop cheaper weapons. But early returns are not encouraging. The Pentagon wants the CCA to be 10% the cost of the piloted fighter it will accompany (not replace!) into battle. That would give it a price tag of about $30 million. But “the initial goal of the Low-Cost Attritable Aircraft Program (LCAAT), a direct ancestor of CCA, was to create a vehicle with a unit cost of $3 million,” the CSIS paper says. “In other words, the projected price point of a ‘low-cost’ autonomous fighter aircraft has jumped an order of magnitude” — there’s that 10-fold increase again — “in the last eight years.”

Augustine, in a puckish 2015 essay(PDF) on his now-infamous fighter-plane financial forecast, conceded things aren’t getting better. That led him to conclude with his newest (and truest) maxim: “If you send money to the management of a project that is in trouble, they will remember you the next time they need money.”

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/the-bunker/

>>22419896

Ask Jim to get an auto bake coded.

Notes are fucking gatekeepers dream now most breads

So why bother? our reach is the world over most info warriors lurk and scrape the good shit as we post it.