https://twitter.com/cjtfarrell

judicial watch's Chris Farrell's account: suspended.

>>2242803

>>2242738

it is very easy to add a fake parenthetical you to a screenshot on this board. i can do it in 30-45 seconds if i need to.

>>2242856

for example

>>2242856

the fake-you proof simply illustrates that the guy claiming the R post is fake can not be verified.

there was never a good dis-proof of the R post, period.

>>2242864

yes - of course. look at the quickie i just posted here:

>>2242877

>>2242922

agreed about the shrill-factor.

at the time (don't take my word for it, ha) BO confirmed that the IP hash for the R post was unique.

if the R poster was a hoax, they did a great job of making impossible for them to definitively prove that it was a hoax.

>>2242966

hey, it's cool.

point of a research board like this is to help distill truth.

point i'm making is that there is nothing clear and/or obvious about whether or not the R post was a "Fraud"…everyone pointed at the guy in the next thread with a "you" screenshot…but as i've illustrated, that's relatively easy to produce quickly…and he had several minutes in which to do so.

does it expressly authenticate the veracity of the post? heck no…but when people such as yourself throw up their hands in exasperation…i have to wonder why.

>>2243022

>>2243028

: ) caught me off gaurd, so 4 minutes. ha.

>>2243083

bang. perfect alignment, less than 3 minutes.

if you don't believe, that's cool, but that's it right there.