Anonymous ID: 7c9cde Jan. 24, 2025, 3:10 p.m. No.22428075   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8110 >>8155

>>22428046

Says you. The fact is the constitution says anyone born here and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, which unless they're children of diplomats they are, then they are citizens. Your feelings don't matter, the law does.

 

Leave it to those who call themselves patriots to ignore the actual law and what it says for their "feelings". Fuck the 2nd and the 4th too right?

Anonymous ID: 7c9cde Jan. 24, 2025, 3:32 p.m. No.22428205   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8219 >>8266

>>22428155

I repeatโ€ฆ The fact is the constitution says anyone born here and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, which unless they're children of diplomats they are, then they are citizens.

 

Your feelings don't matter, the law does.

 

It's just like the 2nd is VERY clear that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, but it is infringed because some jackasses think they know better and ignore the actual law because they're enemies of the constitution. Same with the 4th, it makes it very clear taking money from someone simply because they have it is unlawful, but civil asset forfeiture still exists because some jackass domestic enemies said it's ok and other jackass domestic enemies go along with it.

Anonymous ID: 7c9cde Jan. 24, 2025, 3:37 p.m. No.22428235   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22428219

First, a baby isn't hiding, but that's not what subject to the jurisdiction thereof means. If a diplomat with diplomatic immunity comes here they are not subject to our laws, a kid they have here is not either and is not a citizen. There are people coming here who are subject to our laws even if they violate them.

Anonymous ID: 7c9cde Jan. 24, 2025, 3:47 p.m. No.22428297   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8315

>>22428287

Considering the entire SCOTUS is in bad behaviour and should be locked up, I don't care.

 

The constitution is clear that gun control is unlawful, but scotus says it's ok. The constitution is clear that civil asset forfeiture, the seizure of money simply for having it is unlawful, but scotus says it's ok. The court is "measured" as the bible puts it. To measure is to rule.

Anonymous ID: 7c9cde Jan. 24, 2025, 3:53 p.m. No.22428329   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8381

>>22428315

I just told you, SCOTUS is in bad behavior. Do you know what that means? They have violated the constitution for a very long time. Perhaps you do not understand this, but the constitution of the United States and We the People of the United States are ABOVE the US Supreme Court. My rights do not depend on the courts interpretation of them.

Anonymous ID: 7c9cde Jan. 24, 2025, 4:02 p.m. No.22428409   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22428381

Did you notice where I said WE THE PEOPLES RIGHTS and MY RIGHTS aren't subject to the courts interpretation? Should be obvious shouldn't it genius? Yes I was born here to citizen parents and have never lived in another country, so try again with your bullshit projections.