Anonymous ID: 9c50af Jan. 24, 2025, 3:39 p.m. No.22428248   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8270

>>22428209

>Fawkes tried to blowup Parliament, but was betrayed.

You know he wasn't a superhero from a movie, right? Threatened to blow up a government building. I can think of a few that blew up or tried blowing up government buildings and they sure as fuck should have been betrayed. That's insidious terrorism, and the holiday celebrates the fact that it was stopped, it's failure. Glorifying Guy Falkes is like glorifying Obama in my eyes, making the traitor a hero. The former just a false perception on people's minds painted by a Hollywood movie based upon a comic book.

Anonymous ID: 9c50af Jan. 24, 2025, 4:08 p.m. No.22428461   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22428270

Perhaps, but now you're projecting Guy Falkes onto the Founding Fathers. When I see a group of people wearing that mask and I see NPC's in a deep state controlled movement. Every time I see people projecting that onto other things I think of the deep state trying to keep the idea of their "anonymous" movement alive. There's something that has always been off about it. Something dark. But if people want to use it then, hey, nobody is saying they can't, I'm just saying I won't.

Anonymous ID: 9c50af Jan. 24, 2025, 4:38 p.m. No.22428685   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

You know, come to think of it, it's probably in your best interests to imitate me and post delusion, and reverse-projection, Simple Legion, because based upon your retardation earlier today you obviously can't argue worth a damn anymore or convince anyone to join your little Absolute Retard /Hivemind hate train that isn't already on it. You call me a famefag, I call you a failfag. If you want to imitate the source of a lifetime of failure then so shall you have it for the rest of yours.

Anonymous ID: 9c50af Jan. 24, 2025, 4:41 p.m. No.22428694   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22428688

>Except for the famefag himself.

That's funny because I see two ID's trying to create the consensus that nobody cares. If nobody truly cared no one would have had to comment otherwise and come to the defense of a shill, would they?