Anonymous ID: 13528c Jan. 25, 2025, 7:11 p.m. No.22436331   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6339 >>6345 >>6369 >>6382 >>6413 >>6415

>>22436309

Yeah, sorry shill, but Q kinda screwed the pooch on that one.

Me and some GY anons decided the other night to start using it again.

The whole world refers to anons that follow Q as QAnons and it's not in all bad connotations.

Quite the opposite.

So, combined with not confusing the fuck outta others with the gay ass workarounds, it's back in play.

Anonymous ID: 13528c Jan. 25, 2025, 7:22 p.m. No.22436405   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6439 >>6462

>>22436370

Yeah, well, what tf does Q expect anons to do when some normie says that his fren follows the QAnons on SM and they keep him up with all the bs the Deep State is trying to pull?

Ayo hol up there pardner, did you just say QAnon?

Now listen here there's Q and there's anonsโ€ฆโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 13528c Jan. 25, 2025, 7:29 p.m. No.22436428   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22436382

Yeah, I get it but that's like outdated Boomer Q these days.

All the cool kids just now newfagging on Q are saying QAnon in a positive they're based kinda way.

I'm just no done being the ackshyually guy any longer.

Perhaps I should only use it with my newfrens and not anons here tho.

Go back in the closet so to speak.

Anonymous ID: 13528c Jan. 25, 2025, 7:40 p.m. No.22436499   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6520 >>6529 >>6548 >>6633

>>22436465

Anyone that calls Q QAnon gets told hey man it's just Q.

Then when they go well who's QAnon???

That's where the change is coming in.

Now I just say oh that's just all the anons that follow Q.

Like you if you start doing it then you'll be one of the QAnons, too, even if you don't go to QR.

What's QR.

Uhโ€ฆ fuck it, not important.

Anonymous ID: 13528c Jan. 25, 2025, 8:06 p.m. No.22436658   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22436633

It certainly has un unstoppable life of its own now.

I just got tired of spergsplaining when someone said oooh did you see what that one QAnon twatted out the other day? Spoopy connection!

You have to adjust for the situation and let the good vibes flow.

Anonymous ID: 13528c Jan. 25, 2025, 8:29 p.m. No.22436775   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22436765

Yes, it's a long time (like forever) QR axiom that Bakers don't fuck with other Bakers notes.

However, others would argue it's an outdated relic just like chan rules brought over from /pol/ are.

Feel free to discuss if so inclined.

Anonymous ID: 13528c Jan. 25, 2025, 8:56 p.m. No.22436901   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6922

>>22436881

Normies are saying QAnons when referring to Q followers and it's increasingly in a positive light.

There's a small QR rebel movement that isn't sperging out on them with the There's Q and There's Anons copypasta.

The question posed in this current bread is whether or not this is an QR excomm offense or not?

Anonymous ID: 13528c Jan. 25, 2025, 8:59 p.m. No.22436920   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22436893

Yeah, I don't think some of you will be good comfy blankets when the BOOMs hit and normies freak out a bit.

Q was also big on that being important, too.

You're gonna bitch out the 1st one you see saying Halp me QAnon halp me!