Anonymous ID: 796cde Jan. 25, 2025, 8:23 p.m. No.22436759   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6765

>>22436641

>second baker cannot change first baker's notes

Gif related.

The long held protocol is not to change previous baker's notes and shill bakers have exploited this protocol. Bakers have always had (or is it now simply had?) discretion with notes.

Fuck off imposing your rules.

You a BV or BO?

I reckon so.

Anonymous ID: 796cde Jan. 25, 2025, 8:30 p.m. No.22436789   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22436774

That's how anon interpreted the go for good post, although as with many posts, it left an air of ambiguity.

This anon does not expect any further posts either.

Anonymous ID: 796cde Jan. 25, 2025, 8:33 p.m. No.22436806   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6822 >>6851

>>22436776

>ask oldfag bakers, they know

Yes, thus I speak from a position of experience.

Why do you think I used the term protocol?

Don't try and tell me oldfag bakers never ignored previous baker's notes because I would call you a liar.