Disinformation necessary or what's going on here? Doesn't this statement do the exact opposite? As far as I remember, TG was liked by many reps since he talked about HRC emails. But now. This sounds odd. It more looks like TG is a plant. He tried to publicly gain attention with attacking HRC, so all his focus is on him and now he calls out Trump for no reason so he gets Trump to lose supporters. You get what I mean? That is really snaky as fuck.
Now, if I think about it. Q said something about "trolling". Maybe Gowdy is trolling the left. Maybe he tries to purposefully grow their convince and strength that Trump might be Putin's puppet. Then, when the right moment comes: Boom. All is revealed and Trump is considered innocent, left will destroy themselves.
It makes sense. Because Gowdy is leaving politics anyway, he wouldn't mind his reputation anyway.
Except that R has nothing to do with Q. This board is about Q. Not R.
I don't repeat myself again. BV posted the IP hash history of this supposed "R" several times already. And if you read it, you would clearly come to your senses and see that he's simply fake. Period. You are a Rtard if you keep supporting that fake shit. Simple.
Ad homina and rhetorical sentences with fancy words does not make you any more credible to give you the right to discredit Q.
You made an assumption, so it's onto YOU to prove it. As you cannot prove it, your statement thus is completely irrelevant and false.
Have a nice day too.
Retard. Read my post again. I agree with you. R is fake and larp.
Also, saved.
Exactly 5 months since that post. I am interested.