Anonymous ID: b4e95e Jan. 27, 2025, 4:25 a.m. No.22444967   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4986 >>4998 >>5263

In case anyone's interested, the deepseek mini-crash is BS.

 

The "$100mn → $6mn" that has freaked ppl out is mostly energy costs. The rest is massaged numbers.

 

Yes energy is cheaper in china. Trump wants to fix that.

 

Tell us the energy usage in MWh, not the fucking dollar value

 

Ppl are so dumb.

Anonymous ID: b4e95e Jan. 27, 2025, 4:36 a.m. No.22444998   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5014

>>22444967 >>22444986

>China's been building an average of one new coal-powered electrical generating station, PER WEEK, for the last couple of years at least. All while wagging their fingers at the USA for not shutting down our own coal plants fast enough (and buying US coal on the cheap).

 

TRUMP TEAM SHOULD JUMP HARD ON THIS DEEPSEEK ISSUEit all relates to Trump policies on energy

 

sputnik moment

Anonymous ID: b4e95e Jan. 27, 2025, 5:48 a.m. No.22445263   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5282

>>22444967

>The "$100mn → $6mn" that has freaked ppl out is mostly energy costs

It wouldn't surprise me if China also subsidizes AI energy costs for startups

 

Ppl are being very dumb here.

 

Some faggot in China did NOT find out how to save 94% energy in model training…

 

Free money in NVDA IMO. I don't own any NVDA delta, not my cup of tea. But IMO this is overblown

Anonymous ID: b4e95e Jan. 27, 2025, 5:53 a.m. No.22445282   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5318

>>22445263

>Some faggot in China did NOT find out how to save 94% energy in model training…

 

AND YOU CAN'T EVEN REPLICATE THE TRAINING, SINCE THE TRAINED MODEL IS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

 

So the model itself is not the issue. It's the "training mechanism"

 

People don't know shit about AI yet!!!!!

Anonymous ID: b4e95e Jan. 27, 2025, 6:02 a.m. No.22445318   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22445282

>So the model itself is not the issue. It's the "training mechanism"

 

yeah I'm looking into this more and I'm right

 

In case any anon GAF

 

YOU CANNOT AVOID THE COSTLY TOKEN PROCESSING. THERE WOULD BE PAPERS