>Is there a blind faith movement here now?
That is how you discern the shills from anons. Anons have always questioned and examined what Q dropped with healthy skepticism. Those that demand total ideological purity fall into two categories that I've observed. Conservative boomers who are grasping at straws for a "correction" before they die, and professional division shills paid by the fedbois to derail research and dissemination of the findings to the normies via soc med and word of mouth. Q pointed the way. Anons did the work.
As a white hat psyop, I'd say it was pretty effective.