>>2259453

>States trying to use common law to prosecute federally (like, say HUBER) will be using the law of the state in which the court is sitting.

Fascinating material.

Open question: Does UTAH have any unique laws/legal structure in their state (thinking old laws from 19th century still on the books) that would be relevant here?

https://governmentprinciples.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/the-state-of-utah-a-common-law-republic/

Speaking of the law of the land, not every bill that is passed on by the legislature or congress is the law of the land. Read carefully the wording accompanying that phrase in the constitution. “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; . . . ., shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” (Article VI)

Only those laws made “in pursuance thereof . . . shall be the supreme Law of theLand;. . . ” The Constitution of the United States recognizes only those laws that protect and secure our natural rights. That recognize the first principles of the sovereignty of the people, the proper line of authority delegated to government and the the territorial features of legislation. “All legislation is prima facie territorial.’ American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 213 U.S. 347, 357. These as well as others are common law principles.

>>2261181

Been following this discussion since the beginning and all the anons doing the heavy research have made it VERY CLEAR that this is NOT material that should be acted upon as an individual.

>>2254627

>This info is dangerous to your health.

>>2256265

>Hi anons, Just so you know, you're entering dangerous ground.

Agree that occasional reminders should be mentioned just in case there are lazy crazy lurkers about. Making an assumption, but it seems many of us agree to err on the side of caution here.

>>2258424

Love that song. No sleep til Bariloche.

>5c5af1

>Subscribe.

Thanks for the offer, but don't have a youtube account and don't plan on getting one in the near future.

If your objective is to make it appear as if you are someone that you are not, then you still have quite a lot of room for improvement.

One opinion only, so take with a grain of salt as usual.