Guud evening, little frenlys
>>22471791
Well thats quite a confession, Ron. Would you like to have a seat on my couch and tell me a little bit about when it all started?
>>22471944
You trying to say Jim is the CP pedo Anon?
Get Kekked
Q had indeed referred to themselves as Q Anon and supported and replied to posts from Anons referring to them as Q Anon. You are correct, when the media began attacking Q they delineated the terms.
-
Oldfag Anon
You are wrong
Plenty of Q replies to Anon graphics and twats ref Q Anon. In the early days Q never put a negative connotation on "Q Anon" until much later. Are you new to the movement?
I would agree 100%
And take it a step further and say if Q ever posted again, no one would care.
It's time to put up or shut up, thankfully they shut up
I think you newfag niggers look pretty dumb right now
Because here's Q replying to a bunch of Twitter accounts named QAnon or a variation of such
All in a positive light
Not correcting them or pointing out not to use "QAnon"
Correlating to exactly what I just said
I win
I literally proved exactly what I said 100% now you feel stupid so you're attempting to double down on being stupid
Q replied to tons of QAnon accounts in a positive manner to spread the movement
I win
You lose
Now take a deep breath, spawn and try again
They are really mad that Q replied to tons of QAnon accounts and Anons referring to them as Q Anon. Not in a negative way but in a positive way. Proving exactly my first statement. Proving they are retarded and wrong. Now they are mad. Very, very mad.
Concur and was there
Anons coined the term
Q replied to it positively at first
Until "QAnon" became the MSM label
Rest is history
The newfag shills from 2022 are really showing their newfagness
They literally don't even know the origin of QAnon, and that the term existed far before it was ever mentioned by the MSM
Fascinating