>>2246647 (pb)
For who to look at first/most, here's tips from cuckchan last night:
—-
This list of how to identify possible pedos or the pedo-friendly in Hollywood demonstrates why it happens, if you look it over. It's a trade transaction.
"Hi. I'm new in town. You have fame and fortune. I want that."
"Hi, we're connected pedos. We'll give you that if you give us prestige by association and protection and use your marriages and foundations to supply lots of young children to us."
"That's a deal." At which time this begins, below.
Anybody who suddenly became famous after 1989 is pretty much suspect. Look for these:
If male:
>Worked with Weinstein, Gef or one of their close deputy/boylets
>Met them way too early upon arriving here, as in < a year: a boy party is usually involved
>Not gay yet unusually friendly to gays
>Weak or baseline talent but got roles, jobs immediately - too fast - no struggle period
>Weirdly non-averse to suspected pedophiles
>"Dark", "edgy", "that's just his thing"
>Unusually dark, snuff-like content/roles
>Violence towards children/minors in content
>Always seems to be right place right time
>Always at all the right parties with exactly the right people
>Media fawns over them disproportionate to their actual skillset or looks
>No matter who they're up against they get the award
>Oscar, Emmy or Globe WAY too early and for something even normies know shouldn't have won it
If female:
Same list as above, but add
>Has posed in peculiar group situations
>Poses near or with blood or snuff-like scenery, situations
>Seemingly will debase own body like its trash
>Behaves the way abused children who grow up into women do
>Many are in "comedy", the cabal's word for "boundary testing propaganda department"
>Shaved head off at least once publicly
>Has posed for or with Terry Richardson
>Marries man who does not have sex with her
>Creepily quiet, "hands over ears" to questions about his behavior
>Something about the couple seems "off" if she is married to him
>Collects children (guess why)