TYB!
>How does Soros comm [secure] w/ DNC leaders?
>Q
How does China comm [secure] w/ DNC leaders?
Q
https://qalerts.net/?q=Apr+28%2C+2020
>Isn't that Shakespeare?
Julius Caesar, Act I, Scene III:
Cassius Who's there?
Casca A Roman.
Cassius Casca, by your voice.
Casca Your ear is good. Cassius, what night is this!
Cassius A very pleasing night to honest men.
Casca Who ever knew the heavens menace so?
Cassius Those that have known the earth so full of faults.
If Presidents Can’t Control Executive Agencies, Elections Are Fake
If the executive cannot control his own personnel, agencies, and funding lawfully given to him by a duly elected Congress, elections mean nothing. If the executive is not actually an executor, then the entire bureaucracy is an autocratic, self-licking ice cream cone. It runs the country, not any elected official. And Congress is complicit, because it allows the distribution of opium funds to Afghanistan and queer “safe spaces” in Kenya without ever having to take a public vote on any of this garbage, so long as these taxpayer-provided slush funds slather their retirements and relatives with “nonprofit” and “contractor” lard.
Whatever you want to call unelected bureaucrats and “nonprofit” grifters distributing funds obtained from American citizens against our consent as expressed in elections and line-item votes, it is not a republic, nor a democracy. If Trump can’t fire his own employees and redistribute public funds the executive branch has been given by law, he’s not really the president, and elections are fake.
All this means Trump isn’t “weaponizing” or “politicizing” these agencies. He’s fighting their inherent weaponization. Firing and investigating people who abuse public power, and ending the theft of American labor to fund evil international patronage schemes — that isn’t retribution, it’s justice.
https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/03/if-presidents-cant-control-executive-agencies-elections-are-fake/
>I thought he wasn't big enough. No name recognition.
Q made sure we knew who Epstein and Maxwell were and who they worked for, Anon.
Argument: "Maxwell is not a big enough name to trigger a mass awakening." [example]
Counter-argument: Do not make statements based on assumption of 'worth' and/or 'value'. Do not think 'today' but rather 'after' today.
ONE LEADS TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER.
ONE LEADS TO MANY.
Crimes against Children = common denominator [no matter political affiliation][mass pop awakening].
Have faith in Humanity.
Q
https://qalerts.net/?q=maxwell&sortasc=1
17 post(s) found containing "maxwell".
In recognition of the steps taken by the Government of Canada, and in order to assess whether the threat described in section 1 of this order has abated, the additional 25 percent ad valorem rates of duty, and 10 percent ad valorem rates of duty as to energy products, shall be paused and will not take effect until March 4, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. eastern time.
Progress on the Situation at Our Northern Border
EXECUTIVE ORDER
February 3, 2025
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/progress-on-the-situation-at-our-northern-border/
>this same group of people censoring my social media for 4 years. The same people deleting comments in here.
That's called paranoid delusion. You spam because of your delusions.
Based on your behavior at /qresearch it seems likely the problem is your conduct regardless of the platform.
Your conduct is the problem. Your conduct gets you censored. You have demonstrated repeatedly that you deserve to be censored. The BO and BVs here deserve our appreciation for limiting your continuous tantrums at /qresearch.
I'm not a 'moderator', just another Anon. Your conduct is what gets you censored. You may be mentally ill based on your observed behavior.
>How many times you let people say
You are mistaken. You seem to believe that anyone who objects to your conduct is a person in authority. That is one symptom of your delusion.
>it’s all in my head
That is good insight. Recognizing that you have a problem is the first step towards healing. It is your conduct that leads to censoring, not the imaginary malevolence of others.
Everyone who crosses you is a pedophile. That provides an interesting perspective on your conduct here.
>pedo sympathizer
Your mental illness makes you a somewhat sympathetic figure. Some here may feel a sense of compassion after witnessing your conduct and emotional outbursts, but your projection regarding pedophilia just leads to further painful insights about your character and conduct.