>>2250519

date is readable, clearly wrong.

here's the original:

https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1532237608528.jpg

and archived thread:

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/179647411/#179647703

very strange way to get something so wrong.

>>2251204

ah - excellent point.

i get exactly what you're saying - but i don't think it's entirely fair to say we haven't learned anything. i just blew up the picture to show that the date is visible, and is obviously wrong.

supports your theory.

thanks anon.