Anonymous ID: 13a603 Feb. 5, 2025, 11:32 a.m. No.22516421   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6652 >>6946

>Musk targeting NOAA?

 

https://x.com/letshearthetru/status/1887027465828053413

 

letshearthetruth

 

@letshearthetru

 

Here's the problem: NOAA is tied to Maximus Inc. SEC is tied to Maximus Inc. DOD is tied to Maximus Inc. DOE is tied to Maximus Inc. VES is tied to Maximus Inc. DHHS is tied to Maximus Inc. Census Bureau is tied to Maximus Inc. IRS is tied to Maximus Inc…And the list goes on. Maximus Inc is tied to Catholic Charities which is tied to USAID and Maximus Inc and USAID are tied to or fronts for the CIA. NOAA made the very stupid decision to stop printing paper ocean navigation charts leaving no back up for compromised satellites. The issue you have is that nobody will talk about Maximus Inc which was founded by David Mastran of DARPA and why Maximus Inc has had billions upon billions of no bid contracts with every US agency. What's trustworthy at all about Maximus Inc when it has had very serious data breaches - very possibly by terrorist organizations or foreign adversaries. When you let this problem go on for decades despite the warnings and you fail to do anything about the risks that were made blatantly clear to prospective investors when the company went public in 1997, you end up in a situation where the cancer of one data breach spreads through every single system in every agency because elected officials consistently failed to do a single thing about it.

 

https://www.influencewatch.org/for-profit/maximus-inc-mms/

Anonymous ID: 13a603 Feb. 5, 2025, 12:01 p.m. No.22516654   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22516470

https://x.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1887222808130035896

 

KanekoaTheGreat

@KanekoaTheGreat

A 2006 archived USAID website proudly claims the agency "supported" revolutions in Ukraine, Georgia, Lebanon, and Kyrgyzstan.

 

USAID funded and trained thousands of journalists, lawyers, judges, and election workers, conducted polls questioning election legitimacy, published reports alleging fraud, and helped oversee new elections, among other initiatives.

 

"Many people watched in wonder as the multicolored revolutions took place—the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Rose in Georgia, the Cedar in Lebanon, the Tulip in Kyrgyzstan… Few realized that for years, the United States and other countries and organizations had been supporting this homegrown desire for democracy."

 

"When the Orange Revolution began, 29-year-old television anchorman Andriy Shevchenko was news director of Channel 5, the only regional independent TV network. He had received media training through Internews, a USAID-funded NGO, and visited U.S. TV stations where he learned about investigative reporting, balancing many points of viIs this a good use of American taxpayer dollars?ew, and other aspects of the free press."

 

"At 2:30 a.m. Monday, after the second round of elections, strange results came from the election commission,” said Shevchenko. “Yushchenko left the commission building and said, ‘We don’t trust the results.’ He asked people to come to the Maidan Nezalezhnosti [Independence Square] in the morning. At the station, we realized we would not go to sleep that night, and we kept coverage of the square for 15 days nonstop."

 

"The first days, we were the only channel covering it. Then other channels followed.” Soon, hundreds of thousands would leave their homes and villages to join mass demonstrations."

 

"People were fed up with corruption, election fraud, and the slide back to authoritarian rule, which the independent press was reporting,” said Shevchenko, one of 2,000 Ukrainian journalists trained over the past decade. Support from the United States, Internews, and the European Union created a feeling that others stood with them “in the trenches,” said Shevchenko. Election observers from Ukraine, the United States, and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe also issued widely publicized reports of fraud."

 

"U.S. aid helped us to conduct the poll that showed Yushchenko won while the authorities intended to falsify the elections,” said Anatoliy Rachok, director of the Razumkov Ukrainian Center for Economic and Political Studies which received U.S. and Eurasia Foundaion aid."

 

"For five years, we polled people and reported that the attitude of people towards the government was very negative. The population believed in those figures,” said Razumkov."

 

"Then, when the Center reported that Yushchenko had really won the election, “our poll was believable and it was used by the Supreme Court” in overturning the official tally."

 

"U.S. aid help for the poll was absolutely important—the poll results after the second round made people go to the street,” he added."

 

"Another NGO—Development Associates —did its own democracy preparation work with the Central Election Commission, training 100,000 commissioners for the 2004 elections."

 

"U.S. democracy grants also paid for experts from the American Bar Association (ABA), International Republican Institute (IRI), National Democratic Institute (NDI), the University of Maryland, and other groups to train lawyers, judges, journalists, members of parliament, NGOs, political party leaders, and others."

 

Is this a good use of American taxpayer funds?

Anonymous ID: 13a603 Feb. 5, 2025, 12:38 p.m. No.22516979   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22516949

Aggregation of pertinent information all in one place.

is easy for the journo's to pick up on.

All here on one easy to scroll page, even with notables

for the lazy ones.

They all come here, and will continue to come here.