Thank you Baker
Jesse Watters: “Wow…we finally got our hands on the raw CBS News interview with Kamala Harris that was deceptively edited. And it did not disappoint…”
https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/113955137991232105
>likely previously notabled if not, notable
Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
I watched the full, unedited video of the Kamala Harris interview + reviewed the full transcript as well as the segment that aired on CBS News.
I would encourage everyone who cares about fact driven journalism to do the same.
@60Minutes
did then-VP Harris a favor in the edit room. Her lengthy, "word salad responses” were heavily condensed into a final broadcast segment that felt succinct and presidential. I clocked one of Harris’ answers at over three minutes.
The full, unedited interview was not especially probing, asking questions such as, "Why do you want to be President of the United States?"
That said, the video clip that spurred allegations of "news distortion" was not a journalistic foul but an internal edit.
The public can decide if the heavily edited interview broadcast on 60 Minutes distorted Harris' performance.
And whether then-candidate and former President Trump would have received the same treatment if he had accepted 60 Minutes invitation.
In a statement CBS said, “we edited the interview to ensure that as much of the vice president's answers to 60 Minutes' many questions were included in our original broadcast while fairly representing those answers. 60 Minutes' hard-hitting questions of the vice president speak for themselves.”
👇
https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/1887310679616500028
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-107A1.pdf