>>$42 million
>That would pay for what? Just a few properties?
That would barely cover the groundsman's outhouse at a single estate.
Aren't you just Loretta with the drag off?
>>22521457
Don't pretend to be confused.
Aren't you also Loretta/Tranime?
Who is an excellent baker and makes astute observations when he's sober, BTW.
>>22521474
>No. I’ve never been baker.
I was just wondering if one of you was a sock puppet for the other. My mistake. Carry on.
>>22521482
Yeah, you're an older oldfag.