Anonymous ID: c48ddc Feb. 7, 2025, 6:22 a.m. No.22531276   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1277 >>1652 >>1840

>>22531184 (lb)

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/02/07/nato-countries-discuss-sending-troops-to-greenland/

 

From the article:

Germany was among dozens of European allies understood to have held informal talks over “what Nato troops would do” if the US president followed through on his threats, diplomatic sources told The Telegraph

 

Berlin’s involvement in the clandestine discussions has attracted criticism from some of Nato’s most ardent backers of Kyiv given the refusal of Olaf Scholz, the German chancellor, to consider a deployment of troops to Ukraine.

 

“Berlin doesn’t want to send troops to Ukraine because the situation is ‘too ambiguous’ but is openly flying kites about sending Nato troops to Greenland,” a Nato diplomat told The Telegraph. “It’s a moral compass without a needle.”

Anonymous ID: c48ddc Feb. 7, 2025, 6:22 a.m. No.22531277   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1652 >>1840 >>1962

>>22531276 (me)

 

Guess what?

The Bundeswehr Doesn’t Have a Single Combat-Ready Division, Leaving Germany Totally Dependent of Stationed US Troops for Defense and Deterrence

by Paul Serran Feb. 5, 2025

 

In the context of a ‘powder-keg Europe’ where all they’ve done for years now is worry and plan to fight the bogeyman Russians, it is shocking to see how German governments have allowed their armed forces to sink to such a sorry state.

 

It arises now that the Bundeswehr (German army) is currently in the process of equipping and training its 10th Armored Division to be the first division geared for full operational readiness.

 

You read it right: in Germany, right now, at most ‘part of a division’ would be ready for combat in the event of a military conflict.

 

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung reported (translated from the German):

“Frank Haun, the then head of the armaments company KNDS, said in June 2024 about the current situation of the Bundeswehr in an interview with the F.A.Z.: ‘We can still defend Augsburg with it, but Munich and Berlin [we] cannot’. For the foreseeable future, Germany will therefore be dependent on friends and partners, especially on the units of the American army stationed in Germany’.”

 

There are currently around 38,500 US Army soldiers in Germany, 14,000 of them on a rotational basis, according to the US European Command of the F.A.Z. In addition, there are another 10,000 soldiers of the American Air Force. The largest units are the aforementioned European Command in Wiesbaden, the 56th Artillery Command in Wiesbaden, the 12th Combat Aviation Division in Bavaria and Hesse, equipped with helicopters, the 10th Air and Missile Command in Rhineland-Palatinate and the training center in Bavaria.”

 

Ramstein is the largest American Air Force base outside the US. Landstuhl is home to the largest American hospital overseas, and there are other units distributed in barracks in southern Germany.

 

“As the European Command notes, every [US] unit that is sent to Germany is ‘combat ready’, i.e. immediately operational. In the Bundeswehr, it will be difficult to find a unit at the moment to which this applies. When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 in violation of international law, the Inspector of the Army, Alfons Mais, commented on the state of his branch of the armed forces. This was ‘more or less bare’, he wrote at the time.”

 

After the Cold War, the German army shrank dramatically.

 

The Bundeswehr has a little more than 300 tanks – but only about 100 of them are operational. Compare this to 4,000 tanks back in 1992 and as many as 2,400 in 2004.

 

“However, Germany would have to rely on the United States not only in the event of a conflict, but also when it comes to preventing one, especially in terms of deterrence. After the Cold War, the United States withdrew all ground-based nuclear-capable missile systems with a range of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers from Germany. In July last year, however, Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) and then-American President Joe Biden agreed to bring such systems back to Germany.

 

As the announcement said, this stationing will include three systems: Tomahawk cruise missiles, which are to have a range of up to 2500 kilometers, the so-called Standard Missile, a ballistic missile with a range of up to 1600 kilometers, and the hypersonic missile called Dark Eagle, which is still under development, which is to fly up to 3000 kilometers. These are to be subordinated to the 2nd Multi-Domain Task Force in Wiesbaden. Where exactly the missiles will be stationed has not yet been decided, the EU European Command told the F.A.Z.”

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/bundeswehr-doesnt-have-single-combat-ready-division-leaving/

Anonymous ID: c48ddc Feb. 7, 2025, 7:19 a.m. No.22531542   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1652 >>1748 >>1840

Canada #71

New Jersey Climate Lawsuit Dismissed with Prejudice: Court Rejects Baseless Claims Against Oil Giants Causing Climate Change

by Jim Hᴏft Feb. 7, 2025

 

A New Jersey lawsuit accusing major oil companies of contributing to climate change has been dismissed.

 

The lawsuit, spearheaded by New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin in 2022, targeted industry behemoths like ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66, Shell, and the American Petroleum Institute.

 

It alleged that their operations exacerbated climate-related damages across the state.

 

According to the lawsuit:

Plaintiffs assert that Defendants have engaged in a decades-long campaign to discredit the science of global warming, conceal the dangers posed by their fossil fuel products, and misrepresent their efforts to combat climate change.

 

They claim that despite knowing about the adverse climate impacts of their products since the 1950s, Defendants failed to adequately warn consumers, the public, and decision-makers about these risks.

 

Defendants are alleged to have engaged in deceptive marketing practices, including promoting fossil fuel products as environmentally friendly or “clean,” while downplaying their role in contributing to climate change.

 

Plaintiffs contend that these deceptive campaigns have led to an increase in greenhouse gas pollution, resulting in sea-level rise, extreme weather events, and other climate change impacts that have affected New Jersey residents.

 

The decision, delivered on Wednesday by Superior Court Judge Douglas Hurd, concluded that these legally operating companies could not be held accountable for global emissions.

 

“Because Plaintiffs seek damages for alleged harms caused by interstate and international emissions and global warming, their claims cannot be governed by state law. Under our federal constitutional system, states cannot use their laws to resolve claims seeking redress for injuries allegedly caused by out-of-state and worldwide emissions,” Hurd said in his ruling.

 

Responding to the court’s decision, a spokesperson for the attorney general’s office expressed disappointment.

 

“We are disappointed in today’s decision, which allows some of the country’s most powerful companies to escape accountability for hiding the truth and misleading New Jerseyans about the role their products play in causing climate change,” a spokesperson for the attorney general’s office said in a statement to NJ Spotlight News.

 

“The trial court’s decision is wrong, and inconsistent with decisions in other states, and we are appealing immediately. We will not let companies get away with putting profit above public safety.”

 

The climate hysteria movement is finally being countered by facts and common sense, not by special interest funding.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/new-jersey-climate-lawsuit-dismissed-prejudice-court-rejects/