>>22536001 (pb)

ah, the old 'idol worship' trope.

sorry, when you start with that I can't take you seriously.

The Church evolved from the actions of Jesus Christ and his effect upon the Apostles and the descent of the Holy Spirit.

maybe if you learned Church History instead of just repeating talking points you might have something real to say.

instead you just slander billions of people who lived the life of Christians through being members of the church.

PS: you're 'it is a religion . . . blah blah

on Works instead of Grace' seems to be you judging when you know that's up to Jesus Christ, not you.

shill fail (and moral failing)

>>22536040

ah, such decisive conclusions with NO basis in anything real.

sorry, anon, you're a Catholic hater and I have no need to engage you further.

good bye.

>>22536071

'so blah blah blah blah blah blah blah'

try reading the next part, where Jesus Ascended to Heaven and then the Holy Spirit came down and gave charisms to the members of the early Church.

I know that protestents don't like to acknowledge saints and the souls of the dead as if they are the only one who ever befriended Jesus Christ.

And that is one of the sad things about the schism between Christians.

sorry anon, you do the whole 'free masons talking points' and it's obvious.

>>22536160 (pb)

why don't you pray for her input?

She hears you when you pray for her intercession.

ask her yourself

>>22536376

the degenerate has to post it's unhealthy life choices images.

as if it's somehow sexy, but it's just discusting.

>>22536087

>e2ed35

and you post a picture of someone who made up fables . . .

the false-science know it all with it's grand theories of nothing.

ideas in collision?

Stairway to nowhere?

it's much better when it's labeled properly: historical fiction

or 'fantasy , science fiction.'

>>22536738

false history designed to start an argument.

No account of such a child exists, as there was no such child.

>>22536776

filtered

PS: it's fiction, and it's bad fiction.

if such had happened it would have been recorded.

utterly false and slanderous accusations with no historical basis in fact.

it's just a fiction made up to slander Jesus.

good bye, oh ye filtered troll

>>22536794

more pablum and baby minded analysis.

innocent?

of what?

PS spouting platitudes and expressing guilt towards various religious people is, yet again, just you trying to start an argument.

PS: you imply by mentioning two groups and ignoring other groups that there might be other groups that don't fall short . . .

which is rather wrong.

why did you say two groups and not just 'humans'?

why: because you are a conflict troll trying to incite a fight.

nor is anyone 'innocent' of sin.

you know that is true so why do you only include two groups in your division-narrative?

because you are a troll who merely wants to start an argument.

how tasteless of you to use 'the Glory of God' as a reason to try and start arguments.

you see how you are tasteless and repulsive, right? did you post just to be tasteless and repulsive? I'd say 'yes' to that.