Fucking incredible.
Musk is right!
Musk Calls for Impeachment of 'Corrupt' Judge in Treasury Ruling
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/musk-impeach-judge/2025/02/09/id/1198396/
If they can get one, they can get as many as oppose the president's orders.
This many jusdges opposing POTUS, we must be getting really close to…THE STORM IS UPON US
payseur = pays europe
You forgot Soros
BREAKING
Acting FEMA Director Cameron Hamilton CONFIRMS $59 million in payments went out last week to house illegals in New York City - vows those responsible will be held accountable and payments have been immediately stopped.
https://truthsocial.com/@ConservativeBrief/posts/113980709584083228
GOP starting to open their eyes?
Sen. Ernst: USAID Is a 'Rogue Bureaucracy'
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/joni-ernst-usaid-rogue/2025/02/10/id/1198506/
Monday, 10 February 2025 11:47 AM EST
Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, called the U.S. Agency for International Development "a rogue bureaucracy" after she and her staff independently uncovered partisan and wasteful spending by the agency.
President Donald Trump's advisory Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, has been subject to Democrat anger after exposing alleged fraud, corruption and waste at various agencies, including USAID.
Ernst, Senate DOGE caucus chair, sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday to detail how USAID had misled, lied, and deceived Americans by blocking her extensive efforts to get answers into how tax dollars were spent at the agency.
She also wrote of her experience in dealing with USAID in a Monday opinion column for The Wall Street Journal.
"[T]he U.S. Agency for International Development, entrusted with disbursing tens of billions of aid dollars to other nations annually, is a rogue bureaucracy," Ernst wrote. "I’ve uncovered that the agency often acts at odds with our nation’s best interests and uses intimidation and shell games to hide where money is going, how it’s being spent and why."
The senator said USAID, after repeatedly rebuffing her requests for a list of recipients of U.S. tax dollars sent to Ukraine, permitted her staff to review documents under surveillance in a highly secure room at department headquarters, with note-taking prohibited.
"We learned that the aid that was supposed to alleviate economic distress in the war-torn nation was spent on such frivolous activities as sending Ukrainian models and designers on junkets to New York City, London Fashion Week, Paris Fashion Week and South by Southwest in Austin, Texas," Ernst wrote.
Ernst wrote that she faced similar stonewalling after asking USAID about tax dollars being diverted from project missions for largely unrelated costs, known as the negotiated indirect cost rate.
"The agency claimed that it wasn’t possible to track. My team debunked that by providing USAID staff with a link to a public database," Ernst wrote. "The agency fired back, warning that divulging this information would violate federal laws, including the Economic Espionage Act.
"When I launched a formal investigation in cooperation with the House Foreign Affairs Committee, USAID relented. Turns out, the agency is allowing grantees to skim significant amounts of money, up to and even beyond half of the total, for themselves."
Ernst said USAID has learned to exploit loopholes in the law, and referenced the start of the COVID pandemic as an example.
"The watchdog organization White Coat Waste Project was the first to release evidence that both USAID and Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases were financing bat studies involving coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology," she wrote.
"Yet no grants to the Chinese lab appeared in USAspending.gov. Audits later uncovered that more than a million dollars from the U.S. government were paying for the dangerous research. The bulk of the money was provided by USAID, not Dr. Fauci."
Ernst cited that more than $9 million intended for civilian food and medical supplies in Syria ended up in the hands of violent terrorists, and another $2 million was spent promoting tourism to Lebanon, a nation the State Department warns against traveling to due to the risks of terrorism, kidnapping and unexploded land mines.
"Many other groups supported by USAID are doing great work, such as caring for orphans and people living with HIV. Imagine how much more good work could be supported with the dollars that instead ended up enriching terrorists, sex traffickers, mad scientists and drug cartels," Ernst wrote.
"The question we should be asking isn’t why USAID’s grants are being scrutinized, but why it took so long."
How long before a fed judge tries to overturn this?
Almost time for a storm to blow through and clean them out.
This could be part of the reason for 3 fed judges making a judgement on one item.
https://truthsocial.com/@gatewaypundit/posts/113980901459622543
We are most likely just a few steps away.
This much so…
Federal Judge: Trump Admin Violating Order to Unfreeze Grants
https://www.newsmax.com/us/judge-doge-spending/2025/02/10/id/1198522/
Monday, 10 February 2025 01:26 PM EST
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to stop disobeying his order to unfreeze grants by the federal government.
Judge John McConnell's order demands that President Donald Trump and his administration immediately continue paying for what the administration has frozen for being waste, fraud, and abuse.
McConnell, no relation to the Republican senator, was nominated by former President Barack Obama and brought to the federal bench in May 2011.
"The defendants issued a broad, categorical, all-encompassing directive freezing federal funding," McConnell's response to his initial temporary restraining order (TRO) read Monday. "The plain language of the TRO entered in this case prohibits all categorical pauses or freezes in obligations or disbursements based on the OMB Directive or based on the President's 2025 Executive Orders."
McConnell's ruling responded to a complaint from Democrat-governed states Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and the district of Washington, D.C.
McConnell ruled the pause is unconstitutional unless evidence of fraud is presented to justify the pauses in grants.
"The States have presented evidence in this motion that the Defendants in some cases have continued to improperly freeze federal funds and refused to resume disbursement of appropriated federal funds," McConnell wrote.
"The Defendants now plea that they are just trying to root out fraud. But the freezes in effect now were a result of the broad categorical order, not a specific finding of possible fraud.
"The broad categorical and sweeping freeze of federal funds is, as the Court found, likely unconstitutional and has caused and continues to cause irreparable harm to a vast portion of this country. These pauses in funding violate the plain text of the TRO."