if he took money that was stolen he got a pardon but that doesn't mean he's not liable to have to Pay it back.
use of a baby talk dialect in a cutsie way nullifies all that you pretend to do.
filtered for being irrelevant.
the story is odd.
they say it's 20,000 people and 'twice the national average'.
so that would mean 10,000 people in an area that large elsewhere?
far fetched. the numbers don't jive with reality.
it's a sensationalist story.
still engaging the odd suggestive use of the second person.
you only see what you see for you.
I see what I see. I don't see wha tyou see.
you speak in odd tenses.
your odd tenses of reverting to a 'you' when you mean the first person, 'I', to me seems manipulative.
you seem to be running a psyop.
your life if your life. there is no 'our life' in that regard.
please use correct langauge or you will be considered to be running a psyop.
YOU will , not anyone else, just you.
after I posted that I worried that maybe I'm being unfair to both of them.
that clock seems manipulative to me.
both of those cats are put forward as 'heroes' but I see them differently.
one of the reasons that the Romans were so successful was because of how precisely they made their coinage. It wasn't until they debased it that things really started to fall apart.
Coins are useful to convey a sense of culture and to give messaging. Also they allow for people to teach their children how to be responsible. Also they allow for fair distribution of money, and the ease of payment without a 'mommy please' to a higher authority.
Coins are a useful part of culture and important.
People want something to hold in their hand, so that they can save and/or spend as they will.
Coins are NOT going away.
no, anon, your psyop is what isn't effective.
you create the world with your mind in very many ways.
if you want to imagine some overlord AI speaking to you through the germatica, go right ahead. You'll find it all day long.
but it's you generating it with your mind from the nothing.
did Musk respond to a hoax? no sauce for either of these posts.
gay marriage: someone can marry an old man and get his social security after he dies.
otherwise it would just cease, right.
there are also allotments to 'arts' and other give aways to 'non-profits' so that they don't sue the development.
when the Big Dig was held up in court the project then decided to fund . . . a 'memorial' (yes, I put it in quotes).
and named a bridge after a guy who lived his life as a non-profit maven.
it always seemed like graft and a payoff to me.
but the environmental objections of the suit-happy nonprofits seemed to go away after that.
all involved got filthy rich.
if the metal used to build infrastructure were monetized then when government tore down old construction the people in charge couldn't sell off all the metal for next to nothing for an windfall for their friends. The monetized metal would be as if it were in the 'treasury'.
so the steel on the highway would back notes that would be issued to pay off debts and fund other infrastructure.
each post or guard rail on the highway would have a monetary value as metal. It would be like putting money in a treasury except it would be used to build the infrastructure.
if you 'bought the guardrail' you'd really have to pay for it. (bought the guardrail: hit the guardrail)
everyone knows he is allowed, but the Democrats are just playing interference.
how can someone have a problem with the overnight psyop baker?
considering it is a script that is run to haze the users of the board in the overnight, I suppose no one has an issue with any real person.
seriously?
the illogical 'no one can look at the books' stance of a cuck judge won't hold up.
if that were true, then who would sign the checks?
Oh, it's all automatically deposited?
so then just cancel out the automatic deposit of federal government worker checks, including this judge, so that they have to be issued real checks that are authorized with a signature. But wait, since no one is able to audit that, then there could be no checks issued and this judge would go without his pay check.
how would he like that?
his order seems to imply that an audit is illegal however oversight and audit is built in.
the disbursing of funds to judges would halt if it weren't.
automatic payment: just shut it off to all federal employees.
revert to a bursar who is a live person who audits who is owed what and cuts a check for them.
since no one can audit, so says the judge, then no checks can thus be disbursed.
and thus the judges don't get paid.
1933 : the great theft of property started with the gold . . .
people didn't bring their gold to the bank, they hid it and waited out Roosevelt and his cleptocratic operators.
end automatic payments for all government disbursement.
a check that needs an ID and a signature and a real person presenting it to a bursar who then counts out the money for them and pays them in cash or allows them to deposit it into a banking account: then the government can collect a database of everyone who gets a check and see who is getting too many of them . . .
then the pandemic at the end of that war ground economies to a halt for a time . . .
that wasn't taught in schools that I recall.