>>2256256

No, it needs a disclaimer in the label, such as "Anon claims satanic HRC pics, no sauce." If not, anon can post same shit later (again and again). Also, allows anons to do reverse photo searches or other digs more easily to discredit. Baker doesn't have time to verify by digging, so either includes shit that MIGHT be worthy or lets it disappear forever (or be resurrected again and again). I see the notables as a way for folks to review breads without wading through reams of bullshit. Real anons can make up their own minds when seeing stuff like that.

Also, I think the photos are likely bullshit and NYAnon a LARP, but I have no sauce for that, either.

>>2256394

>>2256422

>>2256391

>>2256432

>>2256472

I didn't see that follow up. As baker, I'd note the BV proof as "LARP alert" instead of "no sauce" on the photos, again for the reasons previously posted.

The sauce discrediting the original is the reason I would have originally "notabled" the post. So anons could discredit a likely LARP.