Still don't believe that was his true "Mother."
Handler perhaps, but not the woman who gave birth to him. Zero similarities in appearance.
Think the "White" thing, was used to defuse his Terrorist genes.
>Iranians?
Speaking of…just came across this
Nuclear Politics in Iran
When in the late 1990s and
early 2000 I did a study of the domestic conversation about Iran’s nuclear weapons program,
I could not find a single person inside Iran who would acknowledge that the country had a
worthwhile and existing program.3
To be sure, there were sporadic discussions in some of Iran’s
newspapers and magazines, particularly after Pakistan tested its first nuclear bomb in 1998,
about whether Iran should pursue a nuclear weapons program, with the overwhelming majority of discussants opposing it. But when I asked questions about the nature of Iran’s extant
program, even among those who opposed a future program, there was a total lack of knowledge
and even quite a bit of skepticism about the existence of or even the capability to pursue such
an effort. Even the possibility of a worthwhile civilian nuclear program, beyond the Bushehr
nuclear plant, was not entertained. In the words of a prominent reformist, “The only thing
nuclear in Iran was civil society.”
The situation changed dramatically in 2002 with the revelation of Iran’s plans for the development of a domestic uranium capability in Natanz and a heavy water reactor in Arak. Iran’s
nuclear program rapidly became a focus of political conversation. Why this was so had much
to do with the pressures imposed on Iran by other countries and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). However, these pressures would not have led to contentious conversation
had there not been a very contentious political environment inside the country. The Iranian
conversation shifted repeatedly as people reacted to details of Tehran’s negotiations with the
IAEA or European Union (EU) representatives (the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, or
EU–3) and because of the political schisms that have characterized Iran’s political environment
since the 1979 revolution. The public discourse focused on Iran’s relations with the world and
on whether to reject the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), enter negotiations with the
Europeans, sign the Additional Protocol to the NPT, continue the suspension of its enrichment
program, temporarily suspend enrichment and enter negotiations with the Americans and Europeans over a package of economic incentives offered in summer 2006, and tone down the
fiery language of Iranian officials and be more “diplomatic.”4
…Although the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) and the Foreign Ministry took
the lead in negotiations with the EU–3, the task of explaining the history of Iran’s nuclear program and its scientific objectives was left to the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI).
However, the scope of these explanations was limited to those aspects of Iran’s nuclear program
under negotiation with the Europeans. Very little was mentioned regarding the reasons for Iran’s
deals with Russia over the Bushehr nuclear plant, the institutions or key players responsible for
making the deal, or the details of the terms, which continue to remain obscure. This suggests
that the domestic audience became more assertive as information was received from external
sources, and that the authorities felt obliged to be more forthcoming to the Iranian public to
counter the narrative offered by these external sources.
A review of media reporting in this period suggests that while the official explanation offered a nationalistic counternarrative, it was also detailed and mindful of the possibility that it would be challenged if it conflicted with internationally known technical details.
…Despite subtle differences in framing the issue in different outlets, the trajectory for Iran’s
nuclear program was essentially the same. Iranians were informed that domestic “research and
laboratory work” on production of nuclear fuel began in the Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani era
(late 1980s), ultimately leading to the signing of an agreement with China’s National Nuclear
Corporation during Rafsanjani’s visit to China in 1994. China agreed to build two 300-megawatt (MW) power reactors and a uranium conversion facility (UCF) plant in Isfahan. This
agreement, as well as attempts to acquire sophisticated parts and designs, was voided in 1997
due to American diplomatic pressure, despite AEOI efforts to persuade China to proceed.
Way moar
https://ndupress.ndu.edu/portals/68/documents/stratperspective/middle-east/middleeastperspectives-1.pdf
Caps
IRT
In Real Time?
LRRA
Federal Liability Risk Retention Act (LRRA)
https://www.riskretention.org/federal-liability-risk-retention-act
FLU.
SPIKE.
Same fkn pic as "COVID"
SPIKE PROTEIN.
AIDS SHIT coming in hot.
They. Did. This.
Not poasting for article, but here's sauce.
Posting for COVID FEAR PORN PIC, NOW USED AS FLU.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-flu-season-bad-doctors-093428478.html
> these poor kids a
You feel sorry for them?
Everyone has a CHOICE.
THEY CHOSE POORLY.
You can carry on the family business, or create your own. IT'S. A. CHOICE. THEY. FREELY. CHOSE. JOB. SECURITY. ALLIEGENCE. TO. GREED. POWER. CONTROL.
That's Demonic. Mind. Fuckery.
"She" was moar than likely, ALWAYS A HE.
Find the Pool pic, shortly after this alleged transition. The muscle tone can't be faked.
> anyone who is elected to public office or works for the government automatically gets audited
Don't forget their FAMILIES
The Big Six’s big media game
Just 37 years ago, there were 50 companies in charge of most American media. Now, 90% of the media in the United States is controlled by just six corporations: AT&T, CBS, Comcast, Disney, Newscorp and Viacom. This means that just 232 media executives are calling the shots for the vast majority of the information we are presented with, controlling a total Big Six net worth of over $430 billion.
It’s been no secret that Big Tech companies — the nickname for the enormous corporations like Facebook or Google — have come under fire recently for their controlling practices. While Facebook and other media giants sought to combat extremism and political misinformation on their platforms, specifically in light of the 2020 presidential election, Bill Baer and Caitlin Chin of Brookings remind us that this only demonstrated the power that social media giants hold over what we consume.
moar
https://pwestpathfinder.com/2022/05/09/the-big-sixs-big-media-game/
SOROS is the REASON for the WAR in UKRAINE.
By: Ciara O'Rourke (Clown Muppet Writer Excuser. USAID recipient surely. "Debunked means, OH SHIT, disparage the truth… ALL TRUE NOW BITCH)
September 21, 2022
Billionaire philanthropist George Soros is a regular bogeyman in online misinformation. We’ve debunked claims that he’s a Nazi who funded antifa and protests in Minneapolis, and that he was behind a news website in Missouri and a lab that developed and released COVID-19.
Now, an Instagram post claimed that in a 2014 CNN interview, Soros admitted to “being behind the political upheaval in Ukraine.”
This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)
We found the interview that the post refers to; it doesn’t show Soros admitting responsibility for the current war in Ukraine, as some reading the post might believe.
Soros’ philanthropy is focused on promoting democracy around the world and he is a longtime donor and promoter of liberal and progressive causes.
In May 2014, he spoke with CNN host Fareed Zakaria about his philanthropic efforts in relation to the conflict then occurring between Ukraine and Russia.
Zakaria first asked about revolutions among Eastern bloc countries in 1989 that led to the end of communist regimes in Eastern Europe.
“One of the things that many people recognized about you was that you, during the revolutions of 1989, funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland, the Czech Republic,” Zakaria said. “Are you doing similar things in Ukraine?”
Soros responded:“Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since. And it played a — an important part in events now.”
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/what-george-soros-said-about-ukraine-in-a-2014-cnn-interview/
>The reason his son Alex Soros bragged openly that he wanted Biden to start a direct war with Russia.
Eactly
And where's Wifey POO HUMA
Working right along with Obutma's Terrorist orgs.
AGREE.
Publically.
That would expose SO MANY puppets who protected him in the Fake Snews too.
Sick of the excuses for demons.
Trump, Musk Slam Soros for Using USAID Funds to Destabilise India | Firstpost America | N18G
>>22568411 No, you're not right. We were told to get LOUD. Stop kuking and start demanding DISCLOUSRE. Arrests. Transparence.
TRUST is Earned.
We elected them to do the heavy lifting.
(All Q posts)
8 years + in, is NOT A NOW FAG.
>The constitution determines how government is setup, and their limits.
Inactive since WWII
Which is why, we're in the Shit we're in today.
US Constitution PAUSED during Wartime.
What Q post says, WE ARE @ War?
What number is the @? 2
WW
>Judges currently have more power than the president does, under the current government.
Mimsi Graham told us…
Military coming in….3,2,1