BV deleting a post last bread and explaining that it was because it had no sauce and BV would post in full with sauce is one of the most retarded explanations anon has yet seen from current admin.
A repost with sauce is not bad. Deleting the OP instead of just tagging it with sauce is the retarded part. Especially when so many anons seem concerned about post deletions and board transparancy..
So, by inference, you are suggesting that these "concerned anons" are shills, right?
Well, the OP of the post that was deleted seemed very pissed off about the deletion and this anon has been very dubious about many of the innovations introduced by the current admin such as deletions and the bread locking faggotry for a start. And if you want to suggest anon is a shillfaggot, you can go fuck yourself in the face.
Well, that's like your opinion man.
Anon can only go by what anon sees and, yes, sure, many of them are divisive shillfaggots.
Guess anon should only really speak from anon's perspective.
Anon, I guess the bakers and admin are constantly attack vectors for shills and anon can kinda understand them lumping everyone into the same basket, but seriously, anon calls for more transparency as many of their actions on the surface appear to be pure faggotry.
And, as you allude to, we are anons but we're also autists and indeed are used to psychological warfare but we also see patterns.
Personally, anon would prefer to see the deletions stopped so autists can see the patterns in the shillfaggotry and to provide board transparency. This would also end most of the marathon breads as well as put an end to the bread locking faggotry (to which anon is wholly opposed).
And speaking of board faggotry, anon did not get a satisfactory answer as to why a BV felt the need to go back and sanitize a locked bread last night. That makes zero sense to anon other than to remove things admin do not want kept on record.
Anon is but an anon, albeit an anon who has been very suspicious of current board admin practices.
Perhaps if current admin actually listened to and responded to anon concerns, more anons might actually back them.
As an FYI, anon is a former OG baker and stopped baking when OSS removed baker for only including anon nommed posts for notables.
Anon has only felt inclined to bake once under current admin and that was when the board was without bread for more than 5 hours.
Anon simply gave up when anon received pic rel.
Admin said this was because proto was activated.
That's right. Everyone who questions the narrative is a shill.
If we didn't question things, we wouldn't be here.
Fucking amazing, isn't it?
Who would have believed at the onset that we would still be here over 7 years.
It certainly has been a marathon and not a sprint.
>let the past be
Anon can only let the past be if anon can trust the present. Currently, anon does not.
Anyway, anon has had enough of airing his grievances, but it has been building up and building up for a very long time.
Give up is not correct, stopped supporting that to which I had no confidence in would be more apt.
Two very different things.
>Spam gets removed. Shill propaganda gets removed.
Anon is concerned about what else get's removed. As mentioned in my first post of the bread, a post was deleted simply because it had no sauce. How do you categorise that? Spam or shill propaganda?
Still, anon has come to expect current admin to be dictatorial and not beholden to their audience.
Anon has faith in anons and our eventual future and, tbh, this is what is keeping anon alive. Anon wants to see this "Brave New World" born anew from the ashes of tyranny and subjugation.
Let the judicial cleaning begin!
So a screencap without sauce is grounds for deletion?
How about memes? Do we have to now sauce claims in memes?
That being said, if it's important, anon does just that.
Call it what you will. Guess it just reached boiling point this bread.
Rest assured, my "trolling" dies with this bread…
for now.