Anonymous ID: 40f4b1 Feb. 12, 2025, 4:17 p.m. No.22571810   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22571298

That's Racist!

Another observation. If you're behind a podium and pushing a position, you're on the take. White, black, repub, dimocrat, you're on the take.

Anonymous ID: 40f4b1 Feb. 12, 2025, 4:52 p.m. No.22571985   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22571369

>We need to be more efficient………..

 

"Service Academy Women" for those in uniform or civil service on how to resist directives from within, without leaving a trace.

 

  1. Rigorous Adherence to Protocols: Insist on following every policy and procedure to the letter, which can slow down processes. This is sometimes called "malicious compliance." Example: Require extensive documentation, reviews, and approvals before implementing policies or directives.

 

  1. Bureaucratic Delay: Use bureaucratic processes to delay decisions or implementation. Examples include:

  2. Asking for clarifications or additional information.

  3. Escalating issues for further review or approval.

  4. Invoking requirements for internal audits, legal reviews, or compliance checks.

 

  1. Over-Communicate: Share directives widely within your chain of command or among relevant stakeholders. Increased visibility can delay or complicate actions.

 

  1. Raise Endless Questions: Seek detailed clarifications or propose alternatives during meetings to slow momentum while appearing constructive.

 

  1. Prioritize Other Tasks: Place directives you oppose lower on your priority list, focusing on higher-priority or more pressing issues to naturally delay implementation.

 

  1. Strategic Interpretation: Apply directives in a way that technically complies but undermines their intended outcomes. Example:

  2. Carry out actions with minimal impact or effectiveness.

  3. Overcomplicate tasks to create bottlenecks.

 

Not kidding.

 

https://x.com/BeneathTheH/status/1883750237186998452