Dems are 'stripped down' of state bullies, Watters argues
'The Five' co-hosts discuss Democrats pinning a sour inflation report on President Donald Trump.
Even "The View" hags are pissed at the democrats
8:51
https://youtu.be/YqCcrqwas18
Dems are 'stripped down' of state bullies, Watters argues
'The Five' co-hosts discuss Democrats pinning a sour inflation report on President Donald Trump.
Even "The View" hags are pissed at the democrats
8:51
https://youtu.be/YqCcrqwas18
Trump has been in office 3 weeks and the dems are blaming the bad inflation numbers that came out today
Dems are losing the ‘information war’: Watters
‘The Five’ co-hosts discuss how Democrats are using the power of song to fight back against Elon Musk’s DOGE efforts.
The Dem Congress people are freakin panicked. This is the REAL PANIC IN DC. (Thanks Q, there's been little panics but this is freaking massive, and everyone can see it on TV, they'd be better off shutting their mouths)
12:37
https://youtu.be/1HzXHoj8Lvs
the dem protestors at the Treasury, singing a freakin weird song. The get like 25 public protesors, compared to MAGA rally that's more than a joke
this is freakin insane, but democrats have been doing it to at least 115 years. They stole a lot more than that, Hunter only got 10%
‘Burn it down’: Experts urge ditching sluggish Pentagon arms process
Feb 10, 2025
The Pentagon’s requirements process for weapons development is a bureaucratic morass that stymies true innovation and must be scrapped entirely and replaced, two prominent defense experts argue in a new Hudson Institute paper. The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System, or JCIDS, is meant to help the Pentagon figure out what capabilities the military needs and confirm whether an acquisition program will fill those needs.
But in a report released Monday, titled “Required to Fail”, former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Industrial Policy Bill Greenwalt and Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Dan Pattargue JCIDS has failed to produce the promised results and — after at least 10 failed attempts at reform — is beyond salvaging.
“JCIDS has failed too completely, too systematically, to be rescued by another committee’s review or a fresh coat of bureaucratic paint,” Greenwalt and Patt said in the report. “The DOD needs to burn it down to its smoldering foundations and let it vanish into history.”
Instead, Greenwalt and Patt said, the Pentagon should replace JCIDS with a new system that focuses on experimentation and prototyping, direct input from combatant commanders and service members and a small, strategic reserve of joint funds at the senior level to bankroll promising new technologies that could help troops across multiple services. Established in 2003, JCIDS formalized the Pentagon’s requirements processes, which began to be established in 1991.
JCIDS was intended to ensure every new system or capability the Pentagon brought on could serve the broader joint force and not just a single service, the Hudson Institute said. It was also intended to give combatant commanders more of a voice in the development process, ensure new systems would be interoperable with other systems, encourage innovation, and ensure new systems help the military implement its strategies.
Those have turned out to be “broken promises,” Greenwalt and Patt said.
Instead, they said, JCIDS has held back military progress — at times, taking more than two years to validate a requirement while adversaries proceed much more swiftly — left potential innovations tied up in bureaucratic red tape and prioritized “paper shuffling” over actually figuring out what would be the most combat-effective system.
JCIDS is “a burdensome layer of ceremony, divorced from the real decisions that shape our future military edge,” Greenwalt and Patt said.
The new system they envision replacing JCIDS would be inspired by past moments where the military moved quickly to meet emergency needs — such as the rapid acquisition process to create counter-improvised explosive device capabilities that took place during the height of the Iraq War, particularly the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle that helped protect many troops.
The new process would create a Joint Operational Acceleration Pathway that would focus on urgent warfighting challenges — or “operational imperatives” — highlighted by combatant commands.
It would also create a fund called the Joint Acceleration Reserve, which could help services pay for promising ideas when an experiment shows that capability might be useful in the field, they said.
And thenew pathway would have a streamlined organization focused on executing projects known as the Mission Engineering and Integration Activity.
This activity would work alongside combatant commands and try to leverage promising technology from both industry and government’s research and development arms.
https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2025/02/10/burn-it-down-experts-urge-ditching-sluggish-pentagon-arms-process/
Russia and China are so far beyond us in war fighting and more armaments, the American Military leaders, get the kickbacks and Generals, grift off the disorder, they themselves created.
Elon Musk’s X to pay $10M to settle Trump lawsuit over Jan. 6 suspension: report
By Reuters Published Feb. 12, 2025 (Dems are going to lose their minds over this. KEKNothing they’ve done is sticking anymore)
Elon Musk’s social media platform X has agreed to pay about $10 million to settle a lawsuit that President Trump brought against the company and its former chief executive, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.
That makes X the second social media platform to settle with Trump over the suspension of his accounts following the storming of the US Capitol by his supporters in January 2021.
Last month, Meta Platforms said it had agreed to pay about $25 million to settle a lawsuit by Trump. Trump filed lawsuits against Twitter, now known as X, Facebook and Alphabet, as well as their chief executives at the time in July 2021, alleging unlawful silencing of conservative viewpoints.
But they ultimately moved forward with the settlement, the WSJ reported.
Musk, who heads Tesla, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency, a new arm of the White House tasked with radically shrinking the federal bureaucracy.
Trump’s attorneys are also expected to pursue a settlement with Google, which banned Trump from YouTube after the 2021 US Capitol riot, WSJ said.
Trump’s team considered letting the lawsuit fizzle out, people familiar with the matter told WSJ, citing the billionaire’s close proximity to the president and the fact that Musk spent $250 million to help elect him.
X and its CEO at the time of Trump’s suspension, Jack Dorsey, as well as Alphabet and the White House did not immediately respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.
https://nypost.com/2025/02/12/business/elon-musks-x-to-pay-10m-to-settle-trump-lawsuit-over-jan-6-suspension-report/
I think we are going to hear a hell of lot more, and not just Bidan, Obama, Clinton and lots of republicans. I'm just waiting for Lindsay Graham to be exposed for his malfeasance for his career. I do get angry for a 20 seconds and it's over, because they are trying to kill us with rage.
yw, I thought it was very interesting, finally the truth comes out, the Pentagon etc. will the military fail. We are so far behind other countries, and we brilliant tech leaders, designers etc. we could be light years ahead of them. I wonder how Hegseth is going to get rid of the flag Fag officers, that got promoted to fail.
That's why Milley left of the $85 Bil in equipment, they have designed a kickback with our enemies. Really, Milley should be court-martialed. If there is no military justice our country is fucked.