Anonymous ID: 09156e Feb. 13, 2025, 4:50 a.m. No.22574158   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4254

>>22574143

 

it's fair to maintain a critical eye towards them.

 

but the overall point wasn't to "banhammer" the term - simply that the moniker was inorganic and invented by the media.

 

if genuine anons started using qanon labels before that clarification, changing it after the fact might have been even more sus.

 

doesn't matter to me. anon is anon. listen, never trust, try to verify, build on collaborated verifiable info.