>>2257886

Document looks legit but the link provided by the Big Cases Bot on twitter takes you to an April 2-3, 2018 filing. What the bot posted isn't included in the link.

Can we sauce this anons? Anyone want to dig?

Manafort’s attorney’s argument against Special Counsels motion that:

Manafort’s team can’t question a witnesses motive even if they’ve been given a deal to testify, and

Manafort’s team can’t suggest that prior investigations into Manafort were resolved with a decision not to prosecute.

>>2258070

Nice PR campaign. Like Judicial Watch has nothing better to do.

>>2258089

>>2258135

This is an awful subject but necessary to address. I just wonder why so many of the reveals have to include muh joos and muh kikes.

>>2258408

Nice find, anon.

>>2258442

Hey! Thanks for outting yourself