Prince Andrew Rocked by Another Scandal After He Thought ‘He’d Put the Epstein’ One ‘Behind Him’

A potential new FBI director has zeroed in on the Jeffrey Epstein case — and it could spell disaster for Prince Andrew.

Kash Patel, President Donald Trump’s pick to serve as FBI director, pledged to uncover and expose new details about notorious pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

During Patel’s appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C., on January 30, the controversial former federal prosecutor and national security official assured that if confirmed he’ll “do everything to make sure the American public knows the full weight of what happened” with Epstein, who died by suicide at 66 in a New York City jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

The politically charged comments quickly reverberated across the pond. Amid calls for a fresh FBI probe into Epstein’s behavior and his ties to potential accomplices, a new report claims the late criminal’s old friend Prince Andrew, 65, is afraid to ever return to the States.

“He is terrified that if he goes to America he could be arrested, face civil action or be subpoenaed,” a source told Britain’s The Sun on February 3. “He’ll never risk going to America again.” In 2019, months after the financier’s shocking death, the Duke of York gave a now-infamous interview to the BBC’s Newsnight program in which he addressed his friendship with Epstein, which began in the ’90s. Andrew also insisted he’d never met Virginia Guiffre, 41, who’s long claimed Epstein forced her to have sex with the royal in 2001 when she was 17.

Andrew has denied Giuffre’s claims. He’s implied that a photo of them taken in 2001 could be fake. But in 2022, the duke reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre for a reported $16 million, ending a civil sexual assault lawsuit she’d filed against him.

The move came two years after Andrew was forced to step down as a senior working royal and weeks after the British navy veteran’s late mother, Queen Elizabeth II, stripped him of his military affiliations and patronages.

The threat of an FBI probe isn’t the only reason Andrew’s faced renewed scrutiny in recent days. In 2019, he told Newsnight he’d cut ties with Epstein in December 2010. However new court docs seemingly reveal they were in contact longer than Andrew initially claimed: On January 31, emails disclosed in a legal filing made by Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority showed an email exchange between Epstein and “a member of the British royal family” believed to be Andrew. In February 2011, the royal allegedly wrote to Epstein, “Keep in close touch and we’ll play some more soon!!!!” The latest drama is in many ways par for the course for Andrew. “He thought he’d put the Epstein scandal behind him,” a source previously told In Touch, but once again “he’s back in the spotlight — in a very bad way.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/prince-andrew-rocked-another-scandal-190708850.html

Dear Pam and Kash

Charge Los Angeles County DCFS, LA Board of Supervisors, Children's Hopsital Los Angeles, and Edelman's Children's Court with RICO

CLASS ACTION NOW!!

Just found this case, which mirrors our complaints as well regarding FALSIFIED TESTING, BIAS REPORTS and a CORRUPT COURT THAT WORKS FOR THE COUNTY!!

There is no ability to escape, when it's ALL RIGGED!!!

(From 2018)

Celeb Doc Files $750 Million Lawsuit Claiming L.A.’s Child Welfare Agency Falsified Evidence

Beverly Hills doctor Susan Spell has filed a new $750 million lawsuit against the county of Los Angeles and individual social workers as she continues the battle to regain custody of her children who were removed from her care in 2013 without a warrant or court order.

In the lawsuit, Spell claims that social workers for the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) falsified evidence and perjured testimony to justify removing Spell’s four children from her care and placing them with their father, who has a documented history of domestic violence.

As The Imprint reported last year, in March 2018, the county paid out a $150,000 settlement to Spell regarding these issues.

In this new lawsuit, Spell’s eldest son, Nicholas, now 18, joins her as a co-plaintiff. The two assert that the wrongful removal of the children from Spell’s care amounts to a violation of the Civil Rights Act and of their Fourteenth Amendment rights.

The suit — in which DCFS is referred to repeatedly as a “flank of the al Quada [sic] cell in the County of Los Angeles” — also alleges a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), claiming that DCFS along with the county, the Superior Court, Family Court judges and county counsel collectively engaged in witness tampering, obstruction of justice, extortion and conspiracy to cover up these acts while carrying out the case against Spell.

Spell filed for divorce in July 2012 after her ex-husband, Brian Evans, was arrested for spousal abuse. An ugly custody battle between the two had been playing out a year — with family court ultimately ruling in Spell’s favor in July 2013 — before DCFS stepped in and placed the children with Evans in October 2013. Spell says that all four children were the product of a sperm donor, and that Evans is not their biological father.

During the custody battle, Evans had visitation rights. Several instances of abuse occurred during these visits, some even warranting trips to the emergency room, according to medical records. These records and a DCFS safety plan show social workers and a number of doctors reported that the children were in danger with Evans. But the children’s caseworkers closed each investigation against Evans, and court transcripts show that the caseworkers told family court officials no such abuse had ever been found.

One social worker who investigated allegations against Evans, Barbara Smith, found that the children weren’t safe with Evans, but pages of her notes were removed from the case file, according to text messages between Smith and Spell and a July 2019 affidavit from former DCFS employee Melinda Wallace.

In the affidavit reviewed by The Imprint, Wallace says the department “has a tendency, even if the parent is innocent, to make them appear guilty in some way, and that includes perjuring testimony, falsifying reports and fabricating evidence to justify taking the children.” She estimates that in 20 percent of cases, parents are “thoroughly innocent,” but DCFS refuses to “admit their mistake(s).”

Throughout subsequent years of back-and-forth decisions in dependency court and appeals by DCFS, Evans has retained custody of the children. He agreed to let the eldest child, now 18, move back in with Spell last year because the tension between he and the boy were so high, but the youngest three — 14-year-old twin girls and a 9-year-old boy — still live with him.

Following the 2018 $150,000 settlement payout, Spell told The Imprint she wasn’t done fighting for her kids to be returned to her.

“I think the settlement is a statement,” she said. “The mere fact that they’re willing to give $150,000 just for us not to take it to court implies that something happened — you did something wrong. I wish along with that, we could do something that makes them act right.”

https://imprintnews.org/news-2/celeb-doc-files-750-million-lawsuit-claiming-la-child-welfare-agency-falsified-evidence/36766