just think of it…
question: to what duty or obligation does one person have to another in disclosing everything they're actually thinking about regardless of the content?
If I thought, but did not speak accuse, that another may be trying to mislead/scam me, if I do not speak accuse, but somehow some way the people knew what the others were thinking and were maneuvering and seeing at a more abstract level what the other is up to by what they say and signalling what they my be thinking on either or all sides to everything said, thoughts withheld are good when the thoughts are accusation of innocence for existing at all as a human life.
The same system demanding everything from you, is the same system demanding refusing to give data of its own systems…
Inconsistency in the idea of computational logic to ensure an internally consistent network or node or any sized intelligence.