just you and God and no one else?
and none of anyone who God has a personal relationship with?
you'll be in a heavenly choir of one?
no group prayer?
you and your ego and God?
in a choir you need more than one person.
how can choirs in Heaven sing God's praises if it's just you?
you're not talking symbolism, anon.
you're talking nonsense.
In Jerusalem one of the businesses was providing animals for blood sacrifice.
and that practice existed throughout the ancient world at other temples: an animal was killed to atone for sins.
The eating of the body and blood, which by all appearances seem to be bread and wine, made the need for blood of animals unnecessary.
but you call it canibalism
>>22597041
your post is wrong
wrong
as if you know what the 'common sentiment' is there.
all you express are your own prejudices.
>>22597134
I know it's illegal for the government to do it.
are you saying that the board is run by the government?
your-own country men?
they are your possessions?
the idea that you know what they think and feel is a fallacy.
you're a bigot.
accept that.
you like to insult people, because it makes you feel superior.
that's the sin of pride.
just accept that you really know nothing about Americans except what you hear in media.
and that you pretend to know what 'your country men' think, but don't really.
and you're just expressing your own, individual, bigoted point of view.
usage of 'kek' gives you away as a fraud, sorry.
why is this bread so filled up with boasting shill trolls bragging about themselves?
Sign in
Churches of Rome: Saint Mark at Campidoglio
Crux Stationalis: Jacob Stein
beautiful Litany of Loreto in this video: chanting Monks in a Venetian tone
bullies here have little to no effect.
they are the 'newfags'
'muh joo haters?': the term muh joo has different meanings to different people. It's all artificial. It's salted into breads to give an excuse.
saying 'faggots bitching about hte board' shows you to be a bully in your own right.
complaining about people 'hassling the bakers' leaves out the idea that some bakers are obvious and reprehenible shills and board-occupiers.
Far fetched and probably just made up.
You provide just accusations and innuendo with nothing to back it up.
Pope Benedict used to argue with you at the kitchen table? Isn't that special.
wow stills from a crappy movie.
those movies were revealing of jaded hollywood and crap writing.
filtered for pretending
He speaks 'shill'
seemed like you were giving sauceless accusations through innuendo ( from Google "an allusive or oblique remark or hint, typically a suggestive or disparaging one.") when you spoke of 'scrolls found'.
you didn't say what scrolls and didn't give any sauce about this so I said 'innuendo'.
I was going to say 'slander' but then changed it to 'innuendo' because I thought slander was too hard a word.
anyway if you did really know these people personally, both of them, I find that remarkable and . . . unlikely.
I'm not afraid of being wrong about this.
>>22597494
your stuff is stale and old.
useless.
please stop.
you provide nothing of value.
>>22597499
the scripts you run are stale
you post these trails of 'Q posted, i was censored' night after night.
you get deleted.
you never prove anything
you give no evidence that Q really did post.
you just post 'Q posted' and get deleted.
it's a stale operation.
doesn't matter if the content is varied, your methods are stale.
please stop using them.
>>22597510
why do you say that?
and the 'we all know' bit is also old-shill-nonsense.
who are this 'we'
if you really knew who I am you wouldn't be saying this.
>>22597511
it can't help revealing itself as 'old-shill'.
it has to do it's word-vomit pejorative bit.
when I post this your post will already be deleted (my guess)
>>22597522
making up a pejorative to use to bully the anons has no effect.
the mean spirit of your posts makes it clear you and your fren are both old-shills, here for years, thrown out, banished from the kitchen, and yet still wanting to cause havoc.
but your impotent presentation is so obvious it gets deleted on sight.
simple?
because I refuse to feed my mind the hollywood fake gore and satanic messaging?
I see it as unrelated images montaged together in a random order? I give it no power. I guard my mind?
yes, that is a simple strategy.
I also used to shut off the television of turn the channel when I used to watch television (which I don't anymore) and I would rip out full page magazine ads with sublinimials from the Time Mag when I was a young man so I wouldn't have to see them.
yes, simple strategy: advert your eyes and block your ears from the shrieks of satanists and their blood red porpaganda pictures
Pakistanis are mean people
>>22597607
I didn't say 'all'.
there is no 'uniting in peace' with people who run grooming gangs, take over foreign governments, and terrorize people who point it out.
I can just imagine it:
the person says 'unite in peace' and seeks out a groomng gang just so he can sing 'Kumbaya' with them.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 20:27:04951f7d (1) No.22597053
just you and God and no one else?
and none of anyone who God has a personal relationship with?
you'll be in a heavenly choir of one?
no group prayer?
you and your ego and God?
in a choir you need more than one person.
how can choirs in Heaven sing God's praises if it's just you?
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 20:31:24951f7d (3) No.22597073
>>22597057
you're not talking symbolism, anon.
you're talking nonsense.
In Jerusalem one of the businesses was providing animals for blood sacrifice.
and that practice existed throughout the ancient world at other temples: an animal was killed to atone for sins.
The eating of the body and blood, which by all appearances seem to be bread and wine, made the need for blood of animals unnecessary.
but you call it canibalism
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 20:35:05951f7d (4) No.22597104
wrong
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 20:33:06951f7d (3) No.22597086
>>22597041
your post is wrong
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 20:37:00951f7d (5) No.22597114
as if you know what the 'common sentiment' is there.
all you express are your own prejudices.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 20:43:08951f7d (7) No.22597171
your-own country men?
they are your possessions?
the idea that you know what they think and feel is a fallacy.
you're a bigot.
accept that.
you like to insult people, because it makes you feel superior.
that's the sin of pride.
just accept that you really know nothing about Americans except what you hear in media.
and that you pretend to know what 'your country men' think, but don't really.
and you're just expressing your own, individual, bigoted point of view.
usage of 'kek' gives you away as a fraud, sorry.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 20:47:58951f7d (8) No.22597203
why is this bread so filled up with boasting shill trolls bragging about themselves?
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:00:20951f7d (10) No.22597297
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:10:05951f7d (10) No.22597345
bullies here have little to no effect.
they are the 'newfags'
'muh joo haters?': the term muh joo has different meanings to different people. It's all artificial. It's salted into breads to give an excuse.
saying 'faggots bitching about hte board' shows you to be a bully in your own right.
complaining about people 'hassling the bakers' leaves out the idea that some bakers are obvious and reprehenible shills and board-occupiers.
Comey is such a total and complete tool.
using the term 'Trumpers' makes him a pariah: a hater with an obvious bias.
the temper tantrum of those cast out into the night for being hateful political marxists continues.
there is no virtue in any of them: they are litigious bullies.
Comey ought to be on trial for treason.
all the 'prosecutors' who 'stood up' were merely political apparachicks on an unholy vendetta to torment the enemies of the democrat regime.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:18:45951f7d (11) No.22597375
Far fetched and probably just made up.
You provide just accusations and innuendo with nothing to back it up.
Pope Benedict used to argue with you at the kitchen table? Isn't that special.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:20:47951f7d (12) No.22597384
wow stills from a crappy movie.
those movies were revealing of jaded hollywood and crap writing.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:22:05951f7d (13) No.22597390
filtered for pretending
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:24:24951f7d (14) No.22597402
He speaks 'shill'
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:47:08951f7d (15) No.22597472
seemed like you were giving sauceless accusations through innuendo ( from Google "an allusive or oblique remark or hint, typically a suggestive or disparaging one.") when you spoke of 'scrolls found'.
you didn't say what scrolls and didn't give any sauce about this so I said 'innuendo'.
I was going to say 'slander' but then changed it to 'innuendo' because I thought slander was too hard a word.
anyway if you did really know these people personally, both of them, I find that remarkable and . . . unlikely.
I'm not afraid of being wrong about this.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:49:28951f7d (16) No.22597483
movies are fake, for the most part.
it wasn't real.
why would I attend to that?
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:51:56951f7d (17) No.22597498
>>22597494
your stuff is stale and old.
useless.
please stop.
you provide nothing of value.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:54:08951f7d (18) No.22597509
>>22597499
the scripts you run are stale
you post these trails of 'Q posted, i was censored' night after night.
you get deleted.
you never prove anything
you give no evidence that Q really did post.
you just post 'Q posted' and get deleted.
it's a stale operation.
doesn't matter if the content is varied, your methods are stale.
please stop using them.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:55:56951f7d (19) No.22597516
>>22597510
why do you say that?
and the 'we all know' bit is also old-shill-nonsense.
who are this 'we'
if you really knew who I am you wouldn't be saying this.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:57:29951f7d (20) No.22597528
>>22597511
it can't help revealing itself as 'old-shill'.
it has to do it's word-vomit pejorative bit.
when I post this your post will already be deleted (my guess)
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 21:59:27951f7d (21) No.22597539
>>22597522
making up a pejorative to use to bully the anons has no effect.
the mean spirit of your posts makes it clear you and your fren are both old-shills, here for years, thrown out, banished from the kitchen, and yet still wanting to cause havoc.
but your impotent presentation is so obvious it gets deleted on sight.
▶Anonymous (You) 02/16/25 (Sun) 22:08:36951f7d (22) No.22597583
simple?
because I refuse to feed my mind the hollywood fake gore and satanic messaging?
I see it as unrelated images montaged together in a random order? I give it no power. I guard my mind?
yes, that is a simple strategy.
I also used to shut off the television of turn the channel when I used to watch television (which I don't anymore) and I would rip out full page magazine ads with sublinimials from the Time Mag when I was a young man so I wouldn't have to see them.
yes, simple strategy: advert your eyes and block your ears from the shrieks of satanists and their blood red porpaganda pictures