Why hasn't John Roberts who appoints the FISC judges or the Judicial Council of the United States taken action to correct the FISA court procedures or at least a study to determine why it rubber stamped the surveillance warrants that the judges knew would include authority to directly surveil Trump before and after the election.
FBI/DOJ did not care about Carter Page. He was just a convenient person to start with so they could use the hop system to surveil Trump, etc.
"FISA Warrant
The FBI and DOJ obtained a FISA spy warrant on Carter Page, a volunteer adviser to the Trump campaign, on Oct. 21, 2016. Under the so-called “two-hop” rule, the FISA warrant could have been used to spy on anyone with two layers of separation from Page himself. This means that both of the people Page was in contact with himself at the campaign could have had their communications surveilled, which is the first hop, as well as anyone who was in contact with the campaign officials, the second hop.
This means that even though Carter Page never talked to Trump himself, as said by Page in a Feb. 6 ABC News interview, Trump could still be spied on, because Page had contact with one of his campaign officials."
https://www.ntd.tv/2018/05/31/the-five-methods-obama-officials-used-to-spy-on-the-trump-campaign/
"You may already be a winner in NSA’s “three-degrees” surveillance sweepstakes!
…So even if the NSA limited its surveillance activities—and by “surveillance” I mean active probing of the content of communications of an individual—to people within two hops of suspected terrorists, that’s a sizable population. Three ratchets it up to hundreds of millions or potentially billions of people, especially when the definition of a hop is based on relationships so casual we could create them by accidentally clicking on a link in a spam e-mail. So far, we know that there have been about 20,000 requests for FISA warrants to surveil domestic targets since 2001, but if those warrants covered three hops from the suspects at the center of the requests—depending on how tightly or loosely the NSA defines a relationship—three hops could encompass as much as 50 percent of the Internet-using population of the world."
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/07/you-may-already-be-a-winner-in-nsas-three-degrees-surveillance-sweepstakes/
Judicial Conference of the United States
"Five standing Advisory Committees of the Judicial Conference have been established, and are charged, respectively, with drafting proposed amendments to the:
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure;
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure;
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; and
Federal Rules of Evidence.
Members of the Advisory Committees include judges, representatives from the Department of Justice, law professors, and practicing attorneys. The Advisory Committees propose rules, subject them to public comment, and then submit them to the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, which in turn submits them to the Judicial Conference, which recommends them to the Supreme Court for approval. Explanatory notes of the drafting Advisory Committee are published along with the final adopted rules, and are frequently used as an authority on the interpretation of the rules."
https://www.revolvy.com/page/Judicial-Conference-of-the-United-States
Similar question could be asked of the Judicial Conference as to why they have not set rules to curtail orders for nationwide injunctions by district judges. May be time for Judicial Conference to be replaced with something that addresses misuse of the justice system.