>>2261322

>Getting a baker was never an issue in october/November

It has always been an issue to have good bakers. It's anons JUST LIKE YOU that we have problems finding good bakers. Who wants to put up with shit the you spew.

>I've had a couple recently that I'm all been given up on bringing forward

Assuming you mean notables, the exact reason we need bakers to be identified is because anons need to know which bakers are fucking with notables. Putting in opinions and leaving out good digs with sauce has been an issue for a long time.

>Are the bakers not the ONLY ones you have any element of control of such things?

If other anons feel your digs are worthy, they are requested as notables.

>I ain't bitchin'

That is exactly what you are doing.

> For those of you dealing in such fuckery

> You look like one of (((them))) and so stupid

You are really glowing. Just go back to lurking and STFU

>>2261352

Baker

try not to let the clowns diminish your spirit. They try every which way to harm us. Remember the greater good of our movement.

I had no idea bakers appreciated the TYB posts. I always thought it was wasting bread. I will endeavor to says thanks in the future. Without good bakers, we would have no bread with which to complain.

Stay strong fren. It will all be worth it in the end.

WWG1WGA

>>2261573

>BO & BVs have NO PROBLEM telling one baker from another

Three problems with that

1. BO/BV not always around

2. Hash history only goers to 75 post

3. IP are always changing for many bakers

This will help BO/BV sort out which bakers anons have issues with.

>>2261569

I've tried to stay away from baker issues but lately the baker hate has gotten out of control. I'm fed up with these clowns causing good bakers to leave. Just like you, I decided back in December I would never bake because of this shit. Bakers who can put up with it have my greatest appreciation. I'll do everything I can to support them and call out those cocksuckers who try to bash them.

>>2261646

Seriously???

You really can't understand how it will help? SMDH.

Because anons like you who bitch about everything and call on BO to make changes and ban certain bakers because of their notables. If there is a shill baker and anons are not happy with him, BO will be able to EASILY track his hash and hopefully prevent the shill from baking in the future.

Why is this such an issue for (you)? It in no way affects you. So, why are you making it an issue?

>>2261679

see

>>2261684

>>2261826

How do you know it's the same one?

>>2261765

>I see good anons ask to bake and BV always ignores them in favor of namefag bakers.

I would love to see your hash history. Not the first time you have made such erroneous claims. It's all been explained and yet you continue with the same slides.

>>2261758

Not anyone's fault you can not understand plain English. You are only looking to cause distraction and division. The issues about the breads have already been addressed by BO, yet you continue with your same shit.

f28cfb

f7b674

^^^^^

Clowns In America