>>2261169

>>>2258234 Bakers, please put "^^^ Next Baker ^^^" below 1st shift notes, & NB >bundle

So will some kind anon please explain how this ^^^^NEW BAKER^^^^ is supposed to help?

BO & BVs have NO PROBLEM telling one baker from another. unique hashes

It is usually possible to tell one baker from another by the editorial choices and text formatting in the notables alone after the bake is posted

The problem is that we ordinary anons cannot reliably tell one baker from another and the BO or BVs aren't always present to vet the handoff.

>>2261585

> wait for a known good baker

how will you know a 'good baker' ???

that 'baker's union' stuff is a scare tactic to keep people from doing something about this BAKER ID problem.

did anyone realize that AFLB was one of the 'baker's union' asshats from the exodus?

how the quality of baking and notables improved for a short while right after it was removed from BO's staff

The problem is when it becomes an exclusive club

it's an exclusive club now, BO & BVs are the only ones who can 'approve' of a baker, we anons still don't know which one is which until after the fact if at all

>>2261618

>This will help

HOW?

>>2261654

so, that still does not explain how ordinary anons will positively identify a baker before the bake

or

how this ^^^next baker^^^ will help the BO / BVs

>>2261691

>There is no need for anyone to "identify" a baker.

???

really?

you'll hand off to anyone?

oh…

>If not known, and no BV/BO around, then baker may decide not to handoff

you just said it didn't matter if they were known then a sentence later you state the need to know before the handoff

make up your mind

either you need to know or you don't

it matters to you or it doesn't

I quit baking on a regular basis because of handing off to unknown bakers who'd shit in the dough.

I started the baking school to foster new bakers who weren't burnt out on the BS

It's a tough job that requires some adult editorial discretion and critical thinking skills

>>2261690

I read it

still no explanation of how ^^^next baker^^ will help

BO & BVs can tell one baker from another without ^^^next baker^^^

>>2261702

>BO, where are you??

was asleep at the wheel

I warned him 8bit about the breads falling off the board early

I warned him about no archive for the late June / early July breads

Didn't listen

Didn't do anything

Just let it happen

Now at least a weeks worth of breads are lost forever.

Q requested proof threads for normies be pinned at the top

Said they'd be needed soon

so why don't I see any?

>>2261733

insults now instead of logic and real answers?

I'm quite well aware of the situation here

I read quite well 'fucktard'

I understand the way 8ch.net works, I was around and lurking while HotWheels was working out the bugs

it's the

>BV or BO verifies a baker, NO ONE ELSE CAN

the problem

NO ONE ELSE CAN

>>2261765

>they don't even update comms.

VidAnon was the only one who stepped up to keep /comms/ updated while I was on vacation this past weekend.

He kept the notables posted at >>>/comms/323

>>2261801

>2nd link every bread,

yes, in the breads, but why isn't that bread ( >>1552095 )pinned?

>>2261828

>Oh god, it's one of them.

Yes, I'm someone who values logic & reason over insults and bullshit

>>2261891

>You're rare.

makes me sad

once upon a time

logic and reason ruled

now it's insults, porn & slides (provided by clowns, shills & shitposters)

makes it very difficult to spot legit digs

makes it hard for the good bakers to do their jobs

really harming the production of good memes and Q proofs

I came here to help MAGA

I will continue to do what I can, with what I have available

I point out problems

I point out successes

I keep the archives at /comms/