grow some hair on it.
gross
everything in this world is being/been consolidated… easier to control
i have a question to lawyerfags or anyone that understands the Constitution better than i do.
my uncle and i was talking the other day, i been keeping him up on the Q movement. hes been researching for decades, before the net.
i was telling him about the eo's thats been signed and to look them up to piece together things that r going on.
he told me that eo's is very un-Constitutional.
my only rebuttal was that all the other past pres have done it and if u cant get congress to do the job, this is only option.
comments?
i believe after this fight is won and the dust is settled. this needs to be addressed/fixed so that it can never be used un-Constitutionally again.
to me, i lean towards uncles view that any president that can simply sign an eo and make it law is un-Constitutional and is no dif than a dictatorship.
i don't know enough about this though so its just imo.
is that Courtney Love?