Anonymous ID: 91ed95 July 24, 2018, 8:07 a.m. No.2262260   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2281 >>2312 >>2538

>>2262046

>They haven't disallowed any newbaker that I have seen

 

>Anons asked for a solution, BO provided one. Do you have a better solution?

 

yes, it was proposed and shot down by anons who fear the 'baker's union' .

BO called it 'baker prestige' to give it his idea of the 'correct spin'

The anons voted overwhelmingly in approval in the straw poll for allowing the bakers to use tripcodes which would eliminate the need for BO or BV vetting.

If a baker proved unworthy the TC is easily removed from the whitelist

This would allow tracking of each baker's breads

We'd all know which baker baked which breads

Anonymous ID: 91ed95 July 24, 2018, 8:36 a.m. No.2262479   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2490 >>2509

>>2262081

>Rusty, there will never be an approved bakers list. Get over it.

 

I was never about an 'approved baker's list'

 

I just want to be able to track which baker bakes which bread

So don't give me that bullshit

I've been crystal clear from the start why I advocate for BAKER ID

I couldn't care less about 'prestige'

I DO care about the quality of the notables

 

I do care that diggers are discouraged by bad bakers who do not include valuable legit digs in the notables

I do care about bakers who shit up the dough

I'm done shitting up the bread

I'm sick and tired of anons deliberately misunderstanding and misinterpreting what I've posted.

If you like it the way it is

with no way for independent tracking of which baker baked which bread, then keep it this way.

Q knows