Anonymous ID: fce4e4 Feb. 20, 2025, 9:27 p.m. No.22624069   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4073 >>4075 >>4078 >>4083 >>4211

Any ideas from youzguyz?

This is not the only film like this, there was one done about twenty years ago ("Dark Side of the Moon", ultimately making fun of the 'Kubrick faked the moon landing' theories) . It's presented as serious but with obvious photoshop and blatant narrative incongruities and historical fictions presented by obvious actors.

 

Is it trying to make fun of 'conspiracy theories', or trying to generate them? I honestly can not tell what is the motivation of the film maker. This is not an inexpensive effort. It has humorous angles in the details but the presentation is skillfully deadpan. What's the point?

Anonymous ID: fce4e4 Feb. 20, 2025, 9:58 p.m. No.22624211   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22624069

forgibs me anons, i can't make screencaps easily

the Closed Caption/subtitles about 10% read like that Monty Python intro.

The Closed Caption is making spoof as well completely unrelated the the fake documentary (comedy?).

 

What is the point other than completely scrambling the mind of the viewer?

Anonymous ID: fce4e4 Feb. 20, 2025, 11:31 p.m. No.22624558   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4685

>>22624484

>i suppose you have to fight batshitcrazy with bsc

I would not agree with that like "fighting fire with fire". The human mind is vastly less predictable than fire, and vastly more dangerous when people figure out they were surreptitiously manipulated.