Gotcha.
Elon Musk bad.
Kash Patel bad.
Tulsi Gabbard bad.
How about orangeman? Is he bad?
>i called it F@G
Anon will believe it when he meets Trump publicly and even then anon would have reservations.
Anon made this meme back when men started competing in women's events and was waiting to see it manifest, but crickets.
It made absolutely no sense.
This "woke" ideology destroyed everything that the feminists had been fighting for.
I wonder how many still call themselves feminists today.
But he nominated and supports each of those you call bad, how can he not be bad?
Is it unable to differentiate between organic content and bot content and paid propaganda?
It can be used metaphorically to describe someone who joins an activity, discussion, or group that they aren't supposed to be a part of. For example, someone might be called a "gate crasher" if they show up uninvited to a meeting or a family gathering.
In this context, to it refer to unauthorised monitoring of communications? NSA, C_A, for example?
Holy fuck!
QResearch, which is beholden to dictates of the BO.
Anon has debated with BO on various occasions about creating massive notable buns and repeating notables in consecutive breads, but anon is merely an anon and anon's opinion is moot.
Anon is well aware of who it is.