Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 7:35 a.m. No.22632809   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Musk Threatens To Cut Off Starlink For Ukraine If No Mineral Agreement Is Made

 

Harsh words about Ukraine (former) President Zelensky, have come from US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio. According to Rubio, the US told Zelensky we have been helping his country battle Russia, but we need to get some of that back through a deal giving the US access to certain minerals, which would help "pay back" that help.

 

Zelensky allegedly agreed, but said he would have to run it past his Legislature. Then, according to Rubio, Zelensky went out in public and lied, telling the media he rejected the deal, and that Ukraine is not for sale. Bad move by Zelensky. Here's video of Rubio revealing what took place: https://rumble.com/v6nv0z9-rt-news-february-22-2025-0900-msk.html

 

Later, it came out that Ukraine may have already signed a deal to sell its minerals to BRITAIN! It now appears that our "ally" Britain may have negotiated re-imbursement from Ukraine long prior to the US doing so, but kept it all quiet!

 

Imagine this GULL: now the UK and Ukraine governments actually think America should provide combat troops and a security agreement to protect their corrupt lying asses!!

 

President Trump is so aggravated that he drove home the new reality with Zelensky and Ukraine, when he said to media "I'm fed up with Zelensky, I'm just tired of him."

 

So aggravated at Zelensky's behavior is the US, that word is now out the United States may CUT-OFF Ukraine's access to Elon Musk's STARLINK satellite internet network.

 

US negotiators pressing Kiev for access to Ukraine's critical minerals have raised the possibility of cutting the country's access to Elon Musk's vital Starlink satellite internet system, three sources say.

 

"Ukraine runs on Starlink. They consider it their North Star," said the source. "Losing Starlink โ€ฆ would be a massive blow." Starlink is literally the ONLY communications system keeping the Ukrainian Army functioning on the battlefield. If Starlink is cut-off, it is widely believed the Ukraine Army would completely collapse within days.

 

https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/world-news/rubio-zelensky-made-agreement-then-went-out-and-lied-about-it-now-faces-cut-off-of-starlink-comms

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 7:56 a.m. No.22632909   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

A war with Russia will derail Trump's agenda and presidency. A war with China will derail Trump's agenda and presidency. Do not call for World War. It's the trap the neo-con globalists hopes MAGA falls into. You were warned!

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 8:01 a.m. No.22632932   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2941 >>2949

>>22632914

Well, yes, I can agree with that, because it is our territory.

 

The South China Sea and Taiwan on the other handโ€ฆ.. that would be suicidal on our part, and it would lead us into another world war, just like getting boots on the ground in Ukraine would.

 

I know there are a lot of anti-China hawks here, many probably brainwashed by neo-con ideology themselves, but any war with another major super power would absolutely de-rail the MAGA movement, a globalist/Soros/WEF trap.

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 8:04 a.m. No.22632945   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2957

>>22632926

Not over the Panama Canal, China doesn't really need that anon. They have plenty of other routes. If anything, the Chinese will scoff at Panama and stop doing lucrative trade with them (as they already threatened to do).

 

Now, completely contrary to somewhere like Taiwan! That the Chinese would fight us for, and it would end up a bigger disaster for us than Ukraine!

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 8:07 a.m. No.22632962   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2983

>>22632949

Panama and US farmland is our territory and the Chinese have already come to terms with that. Sure they don't like it, and they will retaliate with a trade war with us, but they won't go to direct war with us over thatโ€ฆ..

 

However, the South China Sea and Taiwan is a completely different beast. That's their backyard, so to speak. Just like Ukraine is Russia's backyard.

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 8:28 a.m. No.22633081   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22633050

To think for a second that was not already where we were headed with the CBDC and vaccine passports anon. I don't see the MAGA movement supporting such a thing, in reality they have only been derailing the Deep State bureaucracy.

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 8:31 a.m. No.22633105   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3124

As previously reported by this website, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was FIRED by President Trump this week. Now, we seem to understand why: DEI.

 

This is the memo which seems to many people to be the reason the President FIRED this man.

 

https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/national-news/heres-why-the-chairman-of-joint-chiefs-of-staff-cjcs-was-fired-dei

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 8:33 a.m. No.22633112   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22633089

True, it's mostly not realistic because they do not have public support to get directly involved in the war and almost every government, so far, supporting such ideas has been VOTED OUT and we may see the same happen in Germany soon too!

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 8:45 a.m. No.22633193   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3277

Good! Trump Begins Draining The Marxist DEI Swamp In The Pentagon

 

Making good on a campaign pledge to shake up the senior military ranks to ensure a focus on his policy priorities, President Trump on Friday night took the extraordinary step of firing the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and five more senior Pentagon officers. The fired chair, Air Force Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., had only served two-and-a-half years of his four-year term.

 

Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs usually stay in their posts when control of the White House changes hands. Trump's move immediately triggered accusations that he was politicizing the US military. Not so. The Clinton, Bush Jr. and Obama regimes have all done the SAME THING during their terms.

 

To replace Brown, Trump has nominated retired USAF Lt. Gen. Dan "Razin" Cain. The selection of Cain is highly unusual: Not only had he already retired from service, but he would be the first three-star general to ascend to the highest post in the US military. Cain is a graduate of the Virginia Military Institute and an F-16 pilot credited with 150 combat hours and two tours in Iraq. From 2021 to 2024, Cain served as the CIA's associate director for military affairs, collaborating on several highly classified initiatives, the New York Times reports.

 

Announcing the nomination on Truth Social, Trump's praised Cain's performance against ISIS: "During my first term, Razin was instrumental in the complete annihilation of the ISIS caliphate. It was done in record setting time, a matter of weeks. Many so-called military 'geniuses' said it would take years to defeat ISIS. General Caine, on the other hand, said it could be done quickly, and he delivered."

 

Brown was just one of six casualties on Friday night. After Trump's announcement, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth issued a statement indicating that Chief of Naval Operations Adm Lisa Franchetti, Air Force Vice Chief of Staff James Slife have also been removed, along with the judge advocates general of the Army, Navy and Air Force.

 

As for the other officers, Trump and Hegseth promised to clear out officers deemed too have embraced woke ideology, to include emphasis on diversity, equity and inclusion over merit and performance.

 

As previously reported by this website, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was FIRED by President Trump this week. Now, we seem to understand why: DEI.

 

This is the memo which seems to many people to be the reason the President FIRED this man.

 

https://real.news/index.php/news-selections/national-news/heres-why-the-chairman-of-joint-chiefs-of-staff-cjcs-was-fired-dei

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 9:22 a.m. No.22633380   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3394

>>22633350

Ukraine is still holding onto well over 5 TRILLION $$$ in resources, even though Russia now owns around 10 TRILLION $$$ worth in the 5 Oblast regions.

 

Zelensky will have to make up his mind before the Russians start occupying beyond the Dnipro river strongholds. I'd give it till the end of summer before Russians start their offensives beyond that point. If Ukraine can make peace by then, they will be able to keep a decent amount of their resources and land. Best outcome for everyone.

Anonymous ID: 784162 Feb. 22, 2025, 9:30 a.m. No.22633425   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22633350

>perhaps it is to have Americans there, to prevent WWIII with Russia

 

Russia has repeatedly said any Western troops in Ukraine aiding in any way the war are subject to Russian retaliation. Same goes for NATO, mercenaries, French Foreign Legion, etc. I don't think this would end well if American troops were sent over there without the peace deal. It would be risking World War III. A war many of us are absolutely not willing to fight, for ANYONE.

 

The deal can only come through some security accommodations and agreements with Russia. Then, as Putin said, if the war completely ends, and only through a UN peacekeeping resolution agreement voted on, can boots be on the ground without war-time retaliation. Anything else would be an act of war.