I suspect there are many anons who, like me, are not big fans of some of the innovations introduced by the current admin.
Anon would be curious to know just how many.
Anon has discussed anon's concerns and been told that it is my opinion end of story.
However, any criticism of current board admin will instantly get you labelled a shill.
And that is because most of the shit in them is not notable at all or repeats.
If intended as an analogy, I would say I may not understand the rationale behind all the decisions of the Trump administration, but I trust Trump and trust the plan.
Current board admin, not so much.
Yes, BO and BVs have already explained that, but I'm sure Q did not intend that to mean that QResearch must become an MSM news aggregator.
>>22641877
No sauce and no date.
Admin have their opinions and anon has his and I've already been made patently aware that mine is irrelevant to the admin and I can say it goes both ways. There is no point in further discussion.
Alternatively, Francis kicks the bucket and a new pope is elected and then many revelations come out about the evils of the vatican.
Speaking of which, anon has no open sauce record of the vatican repaying the Rothschild's loan.
As a migrant in a different country, anon does not have the right to vote.
Anon has baked and had notables replaced with admin approved notables.
No.