kek
That's why it's best not to explain EVERYTHING to EVERYBODY.
We end up sounding like that guy.
soylent green is people
I like when comedians make fun of his fake English accent.
That's not what I heard.
What I heard
is, bird is the word.
Bababababababababa ba mow mow.
Info on all of this was posted a few weeks ago. Not 100% confident on the validity. Found an article a few weeks ago suggesting it was made up like some of the Brunson info we get.
Supreme Court of the United States
Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al.
Opinion of the Court by the voice of Justice Alito
Delivered January 14, 2025
Today, this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether
the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore—based on a
mortgage loan derived from fiat currency—violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and
Fourteenth Amendments. This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system
that facilitates perpetual debt cycles through fiat currency and usury.
After careful consideration, we hold that the foreclosure proceedings, as applied to Mr. Moore, constitute an
unconstitutional deprivation of his rights to property and due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments. Further, we find that the systemic exploitation inherent in the fiat currency system and its
application to the facts of this case violate the foundational principles of justice enshrined in the Constitution.
I. The Constitutional Context
At the heart of this case lies a mortgage agreement secured by fiat currency—currency that is created
without backing by tangible assets, such as gold or silver. Mr. Moore argues that this currency, lacking
intrinsic value, fails to constitute valid consideration under contract law, thereby rendering his mortgage void
ab initio. He further asserts that the foreclosure proceedings based on such a contract violate his rights to
due process, equal protection, and protection from unjust enrichment.
The Constitution is clear on matters of monetary integrity and individual rights. Article I, Section 10 prohibits
states from making "anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts." This provision reflects
the framers' intent to establish a monetary system grounded in tangible value, ensuring fairness and stability
in economic transactions. Moreover, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments safeguard individuals from
governmental deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
1/4
https://thinkingwithzach.blogspot.com/2025/01/zachary-moore-v-alliant-credit-union-et.html
1/22/25, 9:01 AM
Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito
We cannot ignore the systemic exploitation facilitated by the fiat currency system, which imposes undue
burdens on individuals like Mr. Moore. This system, compounded by the practice of usury, creates perpetual
cycles of debt that are not only mathematically unsustainable but also morally indefensible.
II. Fiat Currency as Unconstitutional Consideration
The issue of consideration is foundational to the validity of contracts. A valid contract requires mutual
exchange of value. However, fiat currency, by its very nature, is created out of nothing and lacks the tangible
backing required by Article I, Section 10. This Court has long recognized the principle that invalid
consideration undermines the enforceability of a contract. In Carpenter v. Longan (1872), we held that a
mortgage is inseparable from the promissory note it secures. If the note is invalid, the mortgage is likewise
void.
Here, Mr. Moore’s mortgage was based on fiat currency—a medium of exchange that contravenes
constitutional intent and economic fairness. We conclude that such a contract, lacking valid consideration,
cannot form the basis for lawful foreclosure proceedings.
III. Violations of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
The foreclosure proceedings also implicate Mr. Moore’s due process rights. The Fifth Amendment prohibits
the deprivation of property without due process of law, and the Fourteenth Amendment extends this
protection to actions by state governments and their instrumentalities. Foreclosure is a significant deprivation
of property that requires strict adherence to procedural and substantive fairness.
The judgment of the lower court is reversed.
more… (had to cut a bit so it would post)
https://foundationfortruthinlaw.org/Bank-Foreclosure/Zachary-Moore-v.Alliant-Credit-Union-et-al-(2025)-Affirmative-Opinion.pdf
ty