Anon does not believe that.
They are the known names.
Who are the unknown names above them?
>Oh shit
You are missing the other two, all caps and the apostrophes.
OH SHIT! OH SHIT! OH SHIT!
2 posts because of yt vid and image
However, for the shits and giggles, watch the vid I posted.
I fucking loathe Shakespeare for the very reason mentioned in the vid.
Pertinent, but may Shakespeare verily go forth and fornicate in the opposite direction.
Anon is a massive book nerd, but being forced to recite Shakespeare at 7 years old and not having a clue what the cunt was saying because of the archaic language installed a deep and long lasting loathing.
Don't get me started on his "comedies".
How to be a flaming famefag faggot?
Isn't it strange that it's only pig that responds to being called out as a famefagging whore to different posters even when it knows it is filtered?
It's almost as if it were running various IPs and forgets which one to use.
Damn, that meme makes me wanna have a fag.
That's a new one to anon. Don't think anon doubts you, but will look into it.
In medieval times, glassmakers turned to the element gold, employing a technique known as “silver staining.” Thin layers of silver nitrate were applied to the glass surface, transforming the red pigment into a dazzling ruby color when exposed to heat. The combination of gold and silver compounds created stunning variations of red, enhancing the beauty of stained glass windows adorning cathedrals and churches of old.
https://learnglassblowing.com/is-gold-used-in-red-stained-glass/
It's OK, it's no effort, just anon doing some noticing as anon passes by.
A big promotion from SS to loudmouth to deputy director. Well done.
You have the right. Petition denied.
Indeed, yes. But what does it say about accepting said petition?
You'll have to forgive anon, anon is not an Americanon.
>why does it matter?
Why does anything matter?
Do you want a philosophical debate?
Are you an autist?
Were you one, you would notice that that noticing is something autists do as it helps see and understand the bigger picture.
Anon kindly suggests that you go forth and fornicate in the other direction because your line of questioning, apart from being impertinent, is irrelevant to the bigger picture and builds nothing of importance.
Therefore, this discussion is herewith terminated.
>>22643501, >>22643525), >>22643531, >>22643542, >>22643548, >>22643551, >>22643580, >>22643595, >>22643636, >>22643644, >>22643685, >>22643709, >>22643716 Macbeth decode
It is buns like this that remind anon of days of yore on the board when aggregating MSM sound bites was not the main focus.
Viva the oldfags.
Does that not need to read: Go fuck yourself in the face?
>Reports now emerging that former Georgia State Representative Stacy Abrams attempted to steal $2 BILLION in fried chicken
This I could believe.
Her being busted, not so much, but anon remains hopeful
Dub 5s chekk't of a fine, upstanding band with no paedophilia or C_A connections at all.
I wanted to write a song about sexuality in the classroom. I’d done teaching practice at secondary schools and been through the business of having 15-year-old girls fancying me – and me really fancying them!
>Imagine being a faggot during the greatest event in history.
To be fair, your post is a bit ambiguous. Aren't we all faggots here?
That being said, there are faggots and there are faggots.
This is a very difficult subject to discuss as Vaticanfaggot has seriously undermined any real research on the subject.
Intentional as a distraction?
With the twitchy finger of BVs these days, any discussion on the subject is currently moot lest they confuse legitimate research and discussion with Vaticanshill faggotry.
In the current climate, with Francis probably on ice and the election of the next puppet imminent, these topics should and will come to fore.
Do we have to redtext a disclaimerAdmin, not Vaticanshillfag, geneuine research and digs?
Legit question. Input?
Anon admits to being confused whether info posted in this bread is legit or vaticanfag
>quoting
While is a preposition and all verb forms that follow a preposition must be gerunds; that is the ing form of the verb used as a noun.
That is something anon cannot answer as anon's research has been but cursory.
Go with the former - smells like oldfag.
Shame you felt the latter wreaked of newfag as it was a legitimate question as we have been plagued by Vaticanfag for a long time,
See this post:
Yes, I know Vaticanfag has whole folders dedicated to copypasta, but with the current climate, anon does not put it past the screaming homo to adapt and overcome and anon is cautious and time poor.
Furthermore, the It will be Biblical Q post takes on an even more significant role.