tyb
investigate & prosecute
the list is not all they have, they have vids, cel phone location data, and WAY MOAR!
it's gonna be biblical, biblical i tell ya!
patience anons, patience!
It will be worth it
https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/new-white-house-boots-reuters-huffpost-out-of-first-cabinet-meeting-mace/
NEW: White House Boots Reuters, HuffPost Out Of First Cabinet Meeting
On Wednesday The White House excluded reporters from Reuters, Huffington Post, and Der Tagesspiegel from covering President Donald Trump’s inaugural cabinet meeting. The exclusion extended to an Associated Press reporter and photographer, who had been previously banned from the pool this month.
The AP’s exclusion came after their refusal to adopt the term “Gulf of America” in place of “Gulf of Mexico.” Meanwhile, teams from ABC and Newsmax, along with reporters from Axios, The Blaze, Bloomberg News, and NPR, were allowed to attend the event.
On Tuesday, the Trump administration made a new policy for press coverage in confined spaces like the Oval Office, stating that the White House would now select the media outlets permitted to attend. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt noted that while mainstream media could still report on Trump routinely, the administration would be revising the roster for coverage in more exclusive settings.
The pool system, overseen by the WHCA, traditionally enables a select group of television, radio, wire, print, and photojournalists to attend events and distribute their findings to a broader audience. Reuters, The Associated Press, and Bloomberg News issued the following statement Wednesday:
“The three permanent wires in the White House pool, The Associated Press, Bloomberg News and Reuters, have long worked to ensure that accurate, fair and timely information about the presidency is communicated to a broad audience of all political persuasions, both in the United States and globally. Much of the White House coverage people see in their local news outlets, wherever they are in the world, comes from the wires.”
“It is essential in a democracy for the public to have access to news about their government from an independent, free press. We believe that any steps by the government to limit the number of wire services with access to the President threatens that principle. It also harms the spread of reliable information to people, communities, businesses and global financial markets that heavily depend on our reporting.”
S.V. Date, a veteran White House correspondent for HuffPost who has sparred with Trump in the past, disclosed to DailyMail that the White House had been notified in advance about his role as the designated representative for both newspaper and online print media at Wednesday’s events.
Traditionally, the White House Correspondents’ Association, which includes journalists from a wide spectrum of outlets, has orchestrated the daily pool’s rotation. On this occasion, however, Date was unexpectedly replaced by a reporter from Axios for Wednesday’s pool duty.
“I will say this, I’ve been pooling now for 10 years, since the Obama administration,” Date shared with journalists in the briefing room.
“The number of times that the Obama White House, Trump White House 1, Biden White House, and Trump White House 2 in the times that I’ve pooled so far have asked for a mistake to be corrected in one of my pool reports? Zero. None. Never,” he said.
“The number of times that any of those White Houses have asked for a correction in one of my stories, that’s also zero. So, it’s not about accuracy, it’s not about competence, and I’ll let them explain what it’s about,” Date added.
A White House official later commented to DailyMail that the “[White House Correspondents’ Association] pool that HuffPost was a part of no longer exists.”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/left-wing-groups-funded-anti-doge-protests-at-republican-town-halls-report
Left-Wing Groups Funded Anti-DOGE Protests At Republican Town Halls: Report
George Soros-funded organizations and other Democrat activists led the protests in GOP districts, which media presented as organic backlash.
The so-called backlash to Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) project on display at recent Republican town halls was actually astroturfed by left-wing organizations.
The legacy media, naturally, jumped on the alleged backlash, with The New York Times, The Washington Post, and CBS News all reporting the protests as if they were organic opposition to President Donald Trump’s attempt to reduce wasteful government spending. It turns out, however, that the protests were anything but organic, according to a report from the Washington Free Beacon.
In its attempt to attack the Trump administration, CBS quoted Maggie Goldman, who organized one of the protests in Rep. Rich McCormick’s (R-GA) district. CBS identified Goldman only as a McCormick constituent. Though she does live in McCormick’s district, Goldman is a self-described “Democrat & Political Activist.” Far from the concerned conservative voter the media painted these protesters to be, Goldman, according to her own LinkedIn page, coordinated volunteers to help Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign. She also ran for her local county commission as a Democrat and has donated only to Democrat campaigns, including Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign. She also publicly boasted about all the media outlets covering her protest, according to the Free Beacon.
But Goldman wasn’t the only leftist organizer of a protest allegedly coming from conservative constituents. Indivisible and MoveOn, which both receive funding from Democrat billionaire George Soros, were behind many of the protests across the country, the Free Beacon found.
“Both groups launched national ‘mobilization’ efforts targeting the ‘Trump-Musk agenda’ and ‘Trump-Musk coup’ during the recess period,” the Free Beacon reported, referring to the week-long Congressional recess. “MoveOn said its ‘members and allies will show up at congressional-led town halls and congressional offices around the country, targeting House Republicans whose votes will be crucial in opposing Trump and Musk’s harmful policies.’ Indivisible issued a ‘Musk or Us Recess Toolkit’ that showed members how to find their local town halls and urged them to ‘take the fight to Elon.’”
Local organizers used the tools to launch protests pretending to be Republicans, gaining local and national media attention. Local media outlets noted Indivisible’s role in the protests, but neither the Times nor CBS mentioned Democrat involvement. The only mention of Democrats in the process from the Times came when it acknowledged that “many of the most vocal complaints came from participants who identified themselves as Democrats.” The Times’ headline, however, reads: “Republicans Face Angry Voters at Town Halls, Hinting at Broader Backlash.”
CBS briefly mentioned that a local outlet “also reported that the Washington County Democratic Party had encouraged people to show up to the meeting with Fitzgerald with signs” but didn’t mention it was organized by Indivisible. The Post noted how “[l]iberal groups encouraged their members to show up to town halls in deep-red territory” in the 14th paragraph of its story but didn’t mention the names of the liberal groups.
As the Free Beacon noted, major media outlets should have known ahead of time that the protests were organized by leftist groups because the organizations sent out press releases, and the Associated Press reported that Indivisible and MoveOn were planning to organize the protests. The AP, however, titled its piece “The anti-Musk protest movement is expected to ramp up with Congress on recess.” That article was published days before other major outlets reported on the alleged “backlash” to Trump and Musk.
>Singh was again denied a visa by the Indian government.
51st stater here..
singh is a sikh who advocates for a kalistan, a separate state in india and one that doesn't exist.
he is a terrorist, plain and simple. he and his party are what is propping up the trudope's liberals.
that is all..
just in time for suicide weekend
oh this is good…
https://www.rt.com/news/613350-judge-orders-trump-unfreeze-aid/
US Judge gives Trump two days to unfreeze foreign aid – media
NGOs and government contractors have sued over the withholding of allocated grants
A US federal judge has given the administration of President Donald Trump less than two days to release billions of dollars in already approved foreign aid frozen last month, multiple media outlets have reported.
Trump froze most US foreign aid funding on his first day in office to have it reviewed for compliance with his “America first” goals. The move comes amid a broader crackdown on wasteful government spending.
District Judge Amir H. Ali first issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) on February 13, demanding the Trump administration release the funds for loans and contracts that had been frozen by presidential order since last month. In a follow-up hearing last week, government lawyers argued that the administration was complying with the TRO, claiming it left them room to cancel and suspect contracts while they were reviewed.
In a telephone session on Tuesday, the judge alleged that the administration had shown no sign of complying with his TRO. Ali ruled that the Trump administration must pay out foreign aid funds to grant recipients and contractors by 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday night, Reuters wrote on Tuesday.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which include NGOs and companies with government contracts, have argued that they have had to lay off employees, shut down programs and risk closing down entirely as a result of Trump’s aid freeze. The NGOs allege that the government has denied them tens of millions of dollars in funds from the State Department and the US Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington’s primary means of funneling funds towards political projects abroad.
USAID, which spends around $40 billion a year on foreign assistance, became one of the first targets for Trump’s government efficiency czar, Elon Musk, and the newly-formed Department of Government Efficiency.
Both Trump and Musk have painted USAID as riddled with corruption and called for the agency to be dismantled.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/supreme-court-finds-radical-agreement-in-case-of-woman-claiming-anti-straight-discrimination
Supreme Court Finds ‘Radical Agreement’ In Case Of Woman Claiming Anti-Straight Discrimination
Marlean Ames alleges that she was denied promotion and later demoted in favor of far-less qualified gay candidates.
U.S. Supreme Court justices found what Justice Neil Gorsuch called “radical agreement” in a case involving a straight white woman who claimed she was denied promotion in favor of less-qualified gay candidates.
The justices heard arguments from plaintiff Marlean Ames, who alleges that her homosexual supervisor at the time denied her a promotion and later demoted her in favor of far less qualified gay candidates at the Ohio Department of Youth Services, per ABC News.
At issue was the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals dismissing Ames’s case out of hand, claiming that a straight, white plaintiff such as Ames does not meet the “background circumstances” required for a discrimination case.
Ames argued that the qualification of “background circumstances” is an unfair burden placed on her simply for being straight and should not affect the enforcement of Title XII.
At the conclusion of oral arguments on Wednesday, the court seemed in near-unanimous agreement to reverse the lower court ruling.
Brett Kavanaugh said, “discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, whether it’s because you’re gay or because you’re straight, is prohibited, and the rules are the same whichever way that goes.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the court’s most liberal justices, called the circumstances behind Ames’s demotion “suspicious,” more than warranting a chance to present her case in lower courts.
“We’re in radical agreement today on that, it seems to me,” Justice Neil Gorsuch said regarding the need for the court to equally apply Title VII protections.
The anticipated decision would not only allow Ames to present her discrimination but potentially set a precedent that makes courts much more likely to take similar cases in the future.
Jonathan Segal, an employment lawyer and partner at Duane Morris LLP, suggested the decision “will reinforce to the public that the law prohibits discrimination equally against majority and minority groups alike.” He added, “This likely will increase in all circuits the already increasing number of claims by members of so-called majority groups.”
Additionally, Segal said, “Of course, the Ames decision cannot be viewed in isolation … A finding of ‘reverse discrimination’ may subject an employer’s DEI programs to federal and state investigations.”
A final decision is expected by the end of June.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-02-26-shanahan-and-trump-demand-answers-geoengineering-public-health.html
The sky’s the limit? Shanahan and Trump demand answers on geoengineering and public health
Nicole Shanahan and former President Donald Trump have demanded answers about chemical spraying in American skies, reigniting a debate over the ethics and secrecy surrounding geoengineering programs.
Shanahan's social media post highlighted visible trails in the sky, questioning whether they were natural contrails or artificial clouds created by chemical spraying, and called for a referendum with full disclosures.
Trump suggested that rising autism rates among children could be linked to chemicals sprayed in the air, hinting at potential revelations about these practices.
Geoengineering, a topic of scientific and political debate for decades, involves large-scale interventions in Earth's natural systems to combat climate change, with potential unintended consequences and health risks.
The debate over geoengineering has brought attention to public health concerns and the demand for democratic oversight of environmental policies, raising questions about the extent of the federal government's geoengineering programs and potential investigations into their health risks.
In a nation increasingly divided over environmental policies and public health, a new front has emerged in the battle for transparency: geoengineering. Nicole Shanahan, former vice presidential candidate and advisor to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has joined forces with former President Donald Trump in demanding answers about the decades-long practice of chemical spraying in American skies. Their calls for accountability have reignited a long-simmering debate over the ethics, safety, and secrecy surrounding geoengineering programs.
A call for transparency
Shanahan’s recent social media post has thrust the issue into the spotlight. In a video shared on X (formerly Twitter), she pointed to visible trails in the sky, questioning whether they were natural contrails or artificial clouds created by chemical spraying. “That looked like it started as a contrail, maybe. Now it’s turning into a cloud. You see how thick that is?” she said. “This has to stop.”
Her caption echoed the frustration of many Americans who have long suspected that government-backed geoengineering programs are being conducted without public consent or oversight. “Many of us know it’s happening. We’d like more details, please,” she wrote. “At the very least, geoengineering should not happen without a referendum with full and accurate disclosures.”
Shanahan’s remarks come on the heels of a surprising statement from President Trump, who suggested during a press conference that rising autism rates among children could be linked to chemicals sprayed in the air. “Maybe it’s a spray that we spray all over the place that nobody else does, other countries don’t,” Trump said. He pointed to the Pennsylvania Dutch community, which he claimed remains healthy because they avoid certain modern interventions. “They don’t do anything, and they’re amazingly healthy,” he added, hinting that revelations about these practices could soon come to light: “You’re going to find out something really soon.”
Historical context: The shadow of geoengineering
Geoengineering—the deliberate large-scale intervention in Earth’s natural systems to combat climate change—has been a topic of scientific and political debate for decades. Proponents argue that techniques like solar radiation management (SRM) and stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) could mitigate global warming by reflecting sunlight back into space. Critics, however, warn of unintended consequences, including disruptions to weather patterns, ecological damage, and potential health risks from chemical exposure.
The U.S. government has a long history of experimenting with weather modification. During the Cold War, Project Stormfury sought to weaken hurricanes by seeding them with silver iodide. More recently, reports of clandestine geoengineering programs have fueled conspiracy theories about “chemtrails”—persistent white streaks in the sky believed by some to be evidence of chemical spraying. While mainstream scientists often dismiss these claims, Shanahan’s and Trump’s comments suggest that the truth may be more complex than the public has been led to believe.
Public health concerns take center stage
The potential health implications of geoengineering are at the heart of Shanahan’s and Trump’s concerns. Trump’s remarks about autism rates and chemical spraying tap into broader anxieties about environmental toxins and their impact on vulnerable populations. While the scientific community has yet to establish a definitive link between geoengineering and autism, the lack of transparency surrounding these programs has left room for speculation and mistrust.
moar..