Canada #72

Germany launches national counseling service for those acquainted with ‘conspiracy theorists’

Emily Mangiaracina Fri Feb 28, 2025

Germany’s new strategy to combat so-called 'conspiracy theorists,' thinly veiled as a counseling service, has been denounced as ‘Orwellian.’

On Thursday, the German government launched a counseling center for those affected by the “conspiracy theories” of family, friends, or colleagues.

“Conspiracy narratives go hand in hand with lies and disinformation,” said Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser in a press release announcing the “Advising Compass Conspiracy Thinking” center. “They are spread in a targeted manner to divide our society and destroy trust in independent science, in free media or democratic institutions.”

Faeser demonized “conspiracy narratives” as a potential trigger of violence, alleging that they “can lead to extremist ideologies and lead perpetrators to criminal and violent acts.”

„Die Einrichtung der bundesweiten Beratungsstelle ist ein wichtiger Baustein in der ganzheitlichen Bekämpfung von Extremismus und Desinformation”, betont Bundesinnenministerin Nancy #Faeser.https://t.co/rqw9GLjVdw

— Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat (@BMI_Bund) February 27, 2025

“Anti-Semitic conspiracy narratives are spread especially often,” she added, referring to an especially fiercely targeted form of speech in post-Nazi Germany, where it has been illegal for 40 years to display Nazi symbolism, such as a Swastika, to deny the Holocaust, or to question aspects of the Holocaust narrative.

She explained that family, friends, colleagues or schoolmates may “first notice when conspiracy narratives are spread,” and claimed that since an open discussion with them may “seem impossible,” the national counseling center is an important part of the “holistic fight against extremism and disinformation.”

These statements suggest that the “counseling” in question will be used to further stymy speech in Germany, as well as potentially target those deemed to have violated hate speech laws. Just last week, an episode of 60 Minutes highlighted repressive German speech laws that have led to the arrests of citizens for in-person or online speech deemed false or “hateful,” such as “racist” cartoons or “fake quotes.”

Federal Family Minister Lisa Paus gave more specific examples of the kind of ideas that qualify as “Conspiracy theories.” According to her, such “narratives feed on the assumption that individuals or groups perceived as powerful influence important events in the world, leaving the population in the dark about their goals.”

Demonizing such an idea not only chills the public exchange of ideas, it defies historical reality, which is patterned throughout with powerful men’s plans to change society and leave the common man “in the dark” about their intentions.

Paus further elaborated that according to these harmful conspiracy theories, such men “develop special power of influence in times of social crisis, also during the Covid-19 pandemic and currently in the context of the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine.” In fact, it is well documented that governments exercised heightened powers during the COVID-19 outbreak, when access to public places was restricted, and citizens were coerced into taking experimental shots and wearing masks.

The world’s richest men also became richer, as many others fell into poverty or lost their businesses during COVID-19 due to lockdowns.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/germany-launches-national-counseling-service-for-those-acquainted-with-conspiracy-theorists/

Canada #72

European Court of Justice | Healthcare Professionals Who Administered Covid Vaccines Are Civilly + Criminally Liable

Feb 27, 2025

The European Court of Justice considers that doctors will be solely responsible for the consequences of covid injections because they were free to refuse to inject.

According to a ruling by the European Court of Justice, all healthcare professionals who urged or vaccinated you against Covid are civilly and criminally liable.

Professor Frajese‘s case before the European Court of Justice had a surprising outcome! According to the Court, a medical prescription was required to administer the anti-Covid vaccines. But there’s more: doctors could have chosen whether or not to administer them, and even advised against them, to such an extent that the potential civil and criminal liability of healthcare professionals is attributable to the specific case.

The reasons given by the Court could thus call into question the disciplinary and criminal proceedings brought against doctors who opposed vaccinations, and instead attribute serious responsibilities to doctors who vaccinated “without ifs or buts”, thus also promoting the risk of causing adverse events. Link to article (in Italian): https://buongiornosuedtirol.it/2025/02/19/esclusivo-vaccini-covid-la-corte-ue-serviva-la-prescrizione-e-il-medico-poteva-sconsigliarli/

“The Court had to confirm, even in a brief parenthesis, that the Commission’s decisions to authorize marketing “do not entail any obligation on doctors to prescribe and administer the said vaccines to their patients”.

He reaffirmed the fundamental principle of the right to freedom of treatment and to choose the most appropriate, safest and most effective treatment by the doctor, in good faith and in all conscience, in the specific case and in the exclusive interest of the patient’s health.

This passage is of extraordinary importance, as it definitively dismantles the charges that have been brought, both in court and in disciplinary proceedings, against all doctors who have advised their patients against Covid vaccination or refused to promote it, thus restoring the doctor’s full freedom of care.

In addition, it confirms the specific liability of vaccinating physicians who have administered the drug inversely, without adequately assessing the appropriateness, risks and safety in the specific case of the patient treated.

More generally, the Court stated that “while the grant of a marketing authorization for a vaccine constitutes a precondition for the right of its holder to place that vaccine on the market in each Member State, that marketing authorization does not in principle entail any obligation on the part of patients or vaccinating doctors”, but above all confirmed that “it is clear from the annexes to the contested decisions that a medical prescription is necessary for the administration of the vaccines in question”. This is what we have always asserted in our appeals in support of suspended workers, who had refused to be vaccinated notably because of the absence of a specific medical prescription, even though in many cases they had asked their doctor for one themselves. The prescription was never issued for any of the millions of doses administered, making all the aforementioned administrations contra legem (valid exemption for those who did not want to be vaccinated), with the legal consequences of the illegitimacy of the regulatory provisions imposing the obligation and the illegitimacy of the “medical act” of the specific administration.”

Let’s talk about the “penal shield” for healthcare professionals. What responsibilities could be attributed to vaccinating doctors?

“The Court’s rulings may influence civil and criminal proceedings aimed at obtaining compensation for damage (biological, moral and property) caused to persons subjected to the said pharmacological treatments, having been administered – on account of the medical malpractice liability of the vaccinating doctors.

– In this case, the medical treatment was administered “in violation of the law” due to the absence of a prior medical prescription (repeatable restrictive prescription, known as RRL). In trying to explain in terms understandable to those outside the sector, the penal shield only works if the medical treatment is administered in accordance with the indications laid down in the authorization acts, which in this case were disregarded, and not just for lack of a careful and adequate medical assessment of each patient hesitating in the formal act of prescribing. “The timing and number of doses administered were very often not consistent with the indications in force at the time of the various administrations, and this prevents the penal shield from being operational”.

The rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union are also binding on national judges, who are faced with the same question: what prospects might there be for the cases still pending, particularly those concerning healthcare personnel suspended and/or struck off during the Covid period?

“As previously stated, the principles set out in this judgment cannot be ignored by national judges, but it is important that they are recalled in a correct and relevant manner. Much will depend on the manner in which the actions giving rise to the proceedings were brought and the grounds and arguments put forward to support the illegitimacy of the measures adopted. It will undoubtedly be fundamental to have raised the question of the infringement of Community legislation and thus to have highlighted the contrast between domestic and European legislation. The CJEU reiterated in several passages of the judgment that it was the task of doctors to assess in the specific case whether or not to administer the Covid-19 vaccines, confirming the need for a prescription to this effect, so that the national rule which conflicts with these principles and, even earlier, with the administration protocols contained in the authorization documents, reaches the limit of inapplicability because it is illegitimate”.

More:

https://www.truth11.com/european-court-of-justice-healthcare-professionals-who-administered-covid-vaccines-are-civilly-criminally-liable/

>>22676762

Underwater yak-hair basket weaving forum

>>22676986

>>22676976

Alberta, Manitoba, and Sask can be their own big country or independent countries, I'm totally for that. BC is a Province of China already

Ontario is an easy enough invasion, tell everybody it's a new virus, mask up stay indoors. When they bitch later tell them all the Zambonis have been ceased and they can have them back when they behave

>>22677088

Ooops

Seized, Zambonis seized

Don't let that cat get me

>>22677092

Still too early to shift to muh mason

You all new over there or did your supervisor go "on vacation" to a country without an extradition treaty and you morans are winging it?

Kept to your schedule all that time and screwing the pooch

>>22677100

Haven't they wanted to be independent for decades already?