Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 4:25 a.m. No.22686165   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6180 >>6547 >>6621 >>6640 >>6714 >>6893

1 Mar, 2025 22:32

Trump adviser describes how Zelensky was kicked out of White House

The Ukrainian leader’s team was “stunned” when they were told to leave, according to Mike Waltz

 

US National Security Advisor Mike Waltz has revealed how Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky and his delegation reacted to being expelled from the White House following a heated confrontation with President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance.

 

The altercation occurred during a meeting on Friday where the leaders had intended to finalize a minerals agreement between the United States and Ukraine. The discussion deteriorated whenZelensky dug in his heelsin andinsisted that Trump should be supporting Kiev more rather than staying neutralin an attempt to mediate a deal with Moscow.

 

Trump accused Zelensky of being ungrateful for American support and unwilling to make necessary concessions to end the conflict, while J.D. Vance criticized him for his lack of diplomacy.

 

In an interview with Breitbart News on Saturday, Mike Waltz said that “the dealmaker-in-chief knows when to walk away from a bad dealor a bad negotiation,” and recounted how he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered Trump’s sentiments to Zelensky’s team.

 

“They were stunned. I don’t know how they thought that could move forward after that kind of very public episode with the entire world watching,” Waltz recalled. “It was really his team – and as you saw from his ambassador, she just put her head in her hands in the middle of the Oval Office – that knew the gravity of what had just happened.”

 

An unnamed member of the White House staff had said earlier that Trump had basically “kicked out” Zelensky and claimed that the Ukrainiandelegation was “begging to reset,” but Rubio and Waltz insisted theyleave the White House grounds immediately, according to Fox News journalist Jacqui Heinrich.

 

Waltz added that the Ukrainian team was informed that “American patience had run out,”describing the sentiment as: “How do you come and insult someone when you’re practically begging them for money and assistance?”

 

“So we made that clear in no uncertain terms. We made it clear that the negotiation, which could have been a fantastic day for them and the country, was over,and that it was time to go,”Waltz said.

 

In the meantime, Rubio slammed Zelensky for “wasting” everyone’s time withhis attitude and questioned his true intentions regarding the conflict with Russia. In an interview with CNN, Rubio said Zelensky “should apologize” for turning the high-level meeting into a “fiasco.”

 

Shortly after the meeting, Zelensky admitted itdid not go well but signaled that he did not plan to apologize to the US leader. In an interview on Fox News, he claimed “we have to be very open and very honest” in bilateral interactions. He blamed some of his statements on being lost in translation but ultimately said he was “unsure”that he did “anything bad” to offend the American people.

 

(https://www.rt.com/news/613561-waltz-zelensky-white-house-stunned/

 

SiriusXM Patriot

@SiriusXMPatriot

"We made it clear that the negotiation, which could have been a fantastic day for them and the country was over and that it was time to go."

@MikeWaltz47

on his message to the Ukrainian delegation after the

@realDonaldTrump

@ZelenskyyUa

White House Blow-Up via

@BreitbartNews

Saturday with

@mboyle1

 

https://x.com/SiriusXMPatriot/status/1895868108612440495

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 4:35 a.m. No.22686183   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6197 >>6213 >>6254 >>6273 >>6547 >>6621 >>6714 >>6893 >>7004

2 Mar, 2025 01:03

UK PM Starmer embraces Zelensky after Trump fiasco

London has promised Kiev a new $2.84 billion loan, whichit hopes to fund with profits from frozen Russian assets

 

Vladimir Zelensky received a warm welcome in London from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, whoreassured the Ukrainian leader of the UK’s “unwavering support” for “as long as it takes”following a contentious meeting with US President Donald Trump.

 

The encounter between Trump and Zelensky at the White House on Friday had been intended to finalize a minerals agreement but devolved into a heated exchange, where the Ukrainian leader dug his heels in and insisted that Washington should support Kiev more rather than act as a neutral mediator with Moscow.

 

Trump accused Zelensky of being ungrateful for American support and unwilling to make the necessary concessions to end the conflict. “We’re looking for peace,” Trump stated. “We’re not looking for somebody that’s going to sign up a strong power and then not make peace because they feel emboldened.”

 

In contrast, Starmer assured Zelensky of the UK’s full backing “for as long as it takes,”emphasizing the importance of reaching a“just and lasting peacethat secures Ukraine’s future sovereignty and security,” according to a spokesperson. (The country’s leader is incapable of anything like “just and lasting peace”, it’s a country lead by terrorists)

 

The UK also announced on Saturday a new $2.84 billion loan to bolster Ukraine’s military capabilities,which London hopes will be repaid with profits from frozen Russian assets. Zelensky hailed the “meaningful and warm meeting” with Starmer and promised that the “funds will be directed toward weapons production in Ukraine.”

 

Since 2022, Washington and Brussels havefrozen an estimated $300 billion in Russian central bank reserves along with billions in private assets. Western officials have proposed redirecting some of the funds to Ukraine, but legal concerns have slowed such efforts. However, proceedsfrom the assets are already being used to back some of the G7 loans to Ukraine.

 

Moscow has repeatedly condemned the asset freeze as “theft,” arguing that accessing the funds would be illegal and set a troubling precedent. The Kremlin also maintains that Western nations’ support for Kiev makes them direct participants in the conflict.

 

The UK is one of the largest individual state donors, having already provided Kiev with more than$15.5 billionsince January 2022. Berlin has sent over $18 billion worth of arms and other aid, while the US has provided almost $120 billion, according to Germany’s Kiel Institute.

 

Trump, however, has estimated the overall US aid to Kiev at over $300 billion and wants Ukraine to reimburse US taxpayers for their generosity via the minerals deal. He criticized his predecessor, Joe Biden, for simply giving cash away like “cotton candy,” while European countries, he noted, would be reimbursed for their aid to Kiev as it was provided “in the form of a loan.”

 

(The UK consistently votes for complete incompetence in their failed leaders for the country; do citizens even get a choice or did Starmer ever care to ask? The UK and EU is getting worse and more deranged every year.)

 

https://www.rt.com/news/613563-london-starmer-zelensky-loan/

 

PDJT should unfreeze Russia’s funds and send it back to Russia, with no EU theft and interference.

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 5:01 a.m. No.22686266   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6282

2 Mar, 2025 10:55

Musk backs US withdrawal from UN and NATO

The tech mogul supports a reassessment of American involvement in both organizations, questioning their relevance and effectiveness

 

Billionaire Elon Musk has publicly endorsed the idea of the US withdrawing from both the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

 

Responding to a social media post advocating such a move on Sunday, Musk, who leads the US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), commented, “I agree.”

 

US President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers have vowed to reconsider Washington’s participation in the UN, as well as in the US-led military bloc.

 

In February,Senator Mike Lee of Utah introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act, proposing acomplete US withdrawal from the UN.Lee criticized the UN as a “platform for tyrants” that attacks America and its allies, arguing that despite significant funding, theorganization has failed to prevent wars, genocides, human rights violations, and pandemics.

 

Echoing Lee’s sentiments, Musk wrote on X that “America provides way too much funding to the UN and associated entities.”

 

During his 2016 campaign, Trump described the UN as weak and incompetent,stating it was “not a friend of democracy… freedom… the United States.” Last month, the Trump administration opposed a UN General Assembly resolution demanding Russia’s immediate withdrawal from Ukraine.

 

Musk, now a key advisor to Trump, has taken the lead in looking for ways to cut costs and reduce the federal workforce. In February, DOGE released its first savings report, claiming an estimated $55 billion in savings through cost-cutting measures.

 

That same month,Elise Stefanik, Trump’s nominee for US Ambassador to the UN, advocated the global adoption of Musk’s DOGE initiative.She criticized the UN’s financial practices and called for a “Global DOGE” effort to reform international governance. (Why isn’t she approved by Senate yet?)

 

Stefanik alsopledged to push for defunding and dismantling UN-affiliated organizationsaccused of corruption and antisemitism.

 

Musk has also voiced skepticism about NATO. In February, helabeled the alliance “anachronistic” and called for a full review, questioning itsrelevance in the post-Cold War era.

 

He alsoquestioned the rationalebehind American taxpayers covering a significant portion of Europe’s defense costs, highlighting that theUS pays for approximately 67% of NATO’s military expenses, despite spending only 3.5% of its GDP on defense.(What? But the EU hates America and it’s more and more clear daily.)

 

His position aligns with Trump, who has frequently criticized NATO, urging members to increase defense expenditure and threatening to withdraw, arguing theUS bears an unfair financial burden for European security.

 

(The Reports on gigantic waste and abuse is unbelievable, almost every dime that funds the UN Climate Change fund has been stolen and that’s only one program. Why don’t we take our property back where it is in NY, kick them out and send them to Europe. That’s what the EU wanted a couple of years ago, because they didn’t like American ambassadors votes. It was the biggest mistake the U.S. made at that time. It’s basically the NWO’s location and master in the U.S. It’s almost like, every org the U.S. started or joined, the countries involved, hate America and steal the money we donate.)

 

https://www.rt.com/news/613571-musk-backs-us-withdrawal-from-nato-un/

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 5:47 a.m. No.22686479   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6621 >>6714 >>6893 >>7004

2 Mar, 2025 13:25

US may launch Nord Stream 2 – FT

The gas pipeline between Russia and Germany is reportedly seen as leverage in Ukraine peace talks

 

US investors are backing a plan to activate Russia’s Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline, the Financial Times has reported, citing sources. The conduit between Russia and Germany, which was never put into operation, may now serve as leverage in the ongoing Ukraine peace talks, the publication has suggested.

 

The deal is being set up by Matthias Warnig, former executive director of the Swiss-based Nord Stream 2 operator, FT claimed on Sunday. Unnamed US investors are supporting the plan in a “once unthinkable movethat shows the breadth of [US President] Donald Trump’s rapprochement with Moscow,” the outlet wrote.

 

During his first term in office, Trump was critical of Nord Stream 2, targeting it with sanctions. In an interview in October, he even boasted that his actions had “killed” the project.

 

Since the outset of his second term in office, however, Trump has initiated a notable shift in US-Russia relations, seeking closer political and economic ties with Moscow and signaling that Washington could “at some point” lift sanctions.

 

Warnig’s plan involves US businessmen reaching out to the White House as part of back-channel efforts to broker peace in Ukraine, the FT wrote. Some in Trump’s team reportedly see Nord Stream 2 as potential leverage in peace talks.

 

One US-ledconsortium of investors has reportedly drawn up the outlines of a post-sanctions deal with Nord Stream 2 owner Gazprom. The US investors would collect “money for nothing,” claimed one senior US official.

 

Nord Stream 2, which was intended to complement the already operational Nord Stream 1, was completed in 2021, but was never commissioned due to concerns over the EU's increased dependence on Russian energy. In September 2022, the pipelines were targeted by a series of underwater explosions, which caused severe leaks.One string of Nord Stream 2 remains intact and filled with gas, but Germany refuses to use it due to sanctions and political considerations.

 

Russia has always insisted on being a reliable energy supplier. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in January that Moscow was interested in resuming gas deliveries to the EU, provided that there are buyers.

 

Brussels moved to eliminate energy reliance on Moscow in the aftermath of the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, and increased purchases of more expensive LNG from the US.Despite this, EU nations continue to buy both the piped fuel and LNG from Russia.

 

The FT reported in January that EU officials were considering the option of resuming Russian pipeline gas imports as part of a potential peace agreement in Ukraine, with proponents arguing that this could lower energy prices in Europe and revive the bloc’s industrial sector.

 

In a recent interview with The Economist, presumed future German chancellor Friedrich Merz insisted there would be no return to Russian gas “for the time being” but conspicuously failed to rule out the possibility.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/613573-us-launch-nord-stream-leverage/

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 6:10 a.m. No.22686600   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6621 >>6626 >>6714 >>6893 >>7004

2 Mar, 2025 12:56

NATO chief urges Zelensky to make peace with Trump

Mark Rutte’s plea comes after the two leaders had a falling out in Washington that strained ties between Kiev and its biggest donor

 

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has called on Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky to mend ties with US President Donald Trump following a heated exchange at the White House.

 

The meeting between Trump and Zelensky on Friday, which Rutte described as “unfortunate” in an interview with the BBC on Saturday, was originally set up to finalize a minerals agreement. It escalated into a tense exchange.

 

The Ukrainian leader maintained that Washington should increase its support for Kiev rather than position itself as a neutral mediator with Moscow. Trump criticized Zelensky for what he perceived as a lack of gratitude for American assistance and an unwillingness to make concessions to resolve the conflict with Russia.

 

The confrontation led to the day’s events being cut short, with the US president reportedly dismissing his guest from the White House. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the encounter as a “fiasco,” with Trump telling Zelensky to return when he was “ready to pursue peace.”

 

“I said: I think you have to find a way, dear Vladimir, to restore your relationship with Donald Trump and the American administration. That is important going forward,” Rutte said, referring to a call he had with Zelensky on Friday.

 

He reminded Zelensky of the support provided by the Trump administration, particularly the provision of Javelin anti-tank weapons in 2019, which were crucial in Ukraine’s defense when the conflict escalated in 2022. Without the Javelins, “Ukraine would have been nowhere,”Rutte stated.

 

The NATO chief emphasized the importance of acknowledging the assistance from the US, which remains Kiev’s biggest donor. The US has provided $65.9 billion in military aid since 2022, according to a US Department of State posting on January 20, 2025.

 

“We really have to give Trump credit for what he did then, what America did since then and also what America is still doing,” Rutte said. (Rutte thinks his compliment and apology by midget will change Trump’s mind. The weird thing is they don’t realize Trump not doing it for praise, but to save the world from WWIII. Russia is not kidding about using atomic weapons if the EU makes more threats, or violates Russia’s sovereignty.)

 

The heated Trump-Zelensky exchange has drawn diverse international reactions. European leaders, including French PresidentEmmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, reaffirmed their support for Ukraine.

 

Conversely, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban endorsed Trump’s stance, praising his peace efforts. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called the meeting a “complete political and diplomatic failure” by the Ukrainian side.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/613580-nato-chief-urges-zelensky-to-mend-ties-with-trump/

 

Rutte’s plan is entirely selfish, he knows Trump and the US are considering reducing contributions or leaving NATO, especially related to the disaster of Ukraine; and how NATO backed that war intensely, and promised the midget membership in NATO multiple times. Not that they were going to do it, but it kept Ukraine fighting and sacrificing the people to “the last Ukrainian”.

 

They still don’t understand Trump.

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 6:19 a.m. No.22686642   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6714 >>6893 >>7004

1 Mar, 2025 23:54

Slovakia will not back Kiev’s war effort – Fico

Ukraine will never be strong enough to negotiate from a position of power, the NATO country’s PM has argued

 

Bratislava will no longer provide military or financial aid to Kiev, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has said,rejecting the Western mantra of “peace through force” and calling for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine.

 

The announcement came in response to a tense meeting at the White House on Friday, where Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky, US President Donald Trump, and Vice President J.D. Vance were expected to formalize a minerals agreement between Washington and Kiev.

 

The discussion devolved into a heated exchange when Zelensky insisted that Trump should support Kiev more instead of remaining neutral in order to mediate a ceasefire with Moscow.

 

Trump cut the meeting short, stating that Zelensky was “not ready” for peace. “We’re looking for peace. We’re not looking for somebody that’s going to sign up a strong power and then not make peace because they feel emboldened,” the US leader told the press afterward.

 

Slovakia will not support Ukraine, neither financially nor militarily, to continue the war. If others do so, we will respect it,” Fico wrote on social media on Saturday.

 

The Slovak leader criticized Kiev’s Western backers for pursuing “peace through force,”calling the approach unrealistic anda pretext for prolonging hostilities.

 

“Ukraine will never be strong enough to negotiate from a position of military power,” he argued.

 

Slovakia plans to propose an “immediate ceasefire” at the upcoming EU summit on March 6, even though the initiative has already been rejected by Zelensky and several EU member states.

 

Fico also warned that restricting Russian gas supplies harms European industry, calling for the resumption of gas transit through Ukraine to Slovakia and Western Europe.

 

“Gas from east to west is not flowing, but Ukraine is taking European gas instead,” he said, describing the current situation as “absurd”and insisting that EU assistance to Ukraine “cannot be a one-way ticket.”

 

While acknowledging the need to strengthen the EU’s defense capabilities, he urged the bloc’s leaders to recognize differing views on the conflict.“If it is not respected at the summit that there are opinions other than continuing the war, the European Council may not be able to agree on conclusions about Ukraine,” he added.

 

Since returning to office in 2023, Fico has been a vocal critic of the EU’s stance on the Ukraine conflict. He has halted Slovakia’s military aid to Kiev, opposed its NATO membership bid, and advocated for immediate peace talks. Fico has also criticized EU sanctions on Russia, arguing that they are ineffective and damaging to Europe, and has urged the West to resume normal dialogue with Moscow.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/613562-fico-ukraine-aid-power/

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 6:50 a.m. No.22686796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6864 >>6893 >>7004

British PM Keir Starmer Says He Will Organize EU Ceasefire Security Force with France +2, and Count on U.S. Military Backstop From Trump

“Dream On Idiots

 

March 2, 2025 | Sundance |

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is holding a Ukraine summit in London today with EU leaders, following two phone calls with President Trump.

 

According to the outline Starmer proposed on BBC News, following the disastrous Zelenskyy meeting in the White House, the British PM called President Trump and also Emmanuel Macron. According to his statements, Starmer told Trump he would work with Macron +2 unidentified countries (a “coalition of the willing”), to organize an EU security force for a Ukraine ceasefire; then the group will require Trump to provide a U.S. troop “backstop” as an insurance policy.

 

Starmer completely ignores the NATO provocations against Russia that preceded the military operationby Vladimir Putin, instead blaming only the aggression of Putin for the expansion of NATO in Europe. Interview Below:

 

Starmer is meeting with EU leaders today, presumably to initiate a discussion of an EU security force that would form the peacekeeping group to secure a ceasefire.However, Starmer consistently says the U.S. backstop is needed to protect the EU forces in the event the ceasefire doesn’t hold.

 

(These “incompetent leaders” refuse to listen to PDJT, he’s already said many times the U.S. will not be involved)

 

https://youtu.be/AklhfyiFoFQ

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/02/british-pm-keir-starmer-says-he-will-organize-eu-ceasefire-security-force-with-france-2-and-count-on-u-s-military-backstop-from-trump/#more-269699

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 6:57 a.m. No.22686856   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6877 >>6893 >>6938 >>7004

AG Pam Bondi Appears on Fox News to Discuss the Joy of Working Against Lawfare and Deep State Bureaucracy

 

March 2, 2025 | Sundance |

A joyful and happy Dept of Justice Attorney General Pam Bondi appears with Mark Levin to discuss her role in supporting the administration and her “great joy” in working with “great friends” in the cabinet to actuate the legal arguments needed to advance their objective.

 

As guided by Mark Levin and noted by Mrs Bondi, “there are so many incredible people participating in the effort” she is just thankful to be able to play a small part. AG Bondi looks forward to telling the American people on Fox News about all of the exiting things the Dept of Justice is doing. WATCH:

 

https://youtu.be/wr2Q-MgE97g

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/02/ag-pam-bondi-appears-on-fox-news-to-discuss-the-joy-of-working-against-lawfare-and-deep-state-bureaucracy/

 

I wish Matt Gaetz was USAG, I don’t trust Bondi

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 7:09 a.m. No.22686932   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6935 >>6953 >>7004

Team Zelenskyy Has a “Security Guarantee” Plan to Recapture all Lost Ukraine Territory

March 1, 2025 | Sundance |

The broader ‘western’ intelligence actors have been in control of Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s activity in the conflict with Russia.The outline of their plan is within the statements deliveredby the Ukrainian leader, we just have to accept them.

 

The people who control Ukraine, Intelligence Community, CIA, elements of U.S. State Dept., NATO, EU Commission and the private sector banks and World Economic Forum investment handlers, do not want to accept a Ukraine-Russia ceasefire or peace agreement.

 

This aforementioned network of influence agentsspecifically does not want President Trump and President Putin to come to terms, because they well understand the regional territory of Ukraine will not return. However, if you look closely at the demand by Ukraine for U.S. troops as the contingency for “security guarantees” the outline of a scheme is clear.

 

[SOURCE]

 

It’s a trap!

 

As soon as U.S. troops enter the equation on the ground in Russia, particularly as the buffer force in the point of conflict between Ukranian and Russian military,there will be some intentional event createdto harm U.S. troops and thrust the USA NATO alliance in direct combat with Russia.

 

This is theelement of Zelenskyy’s greatest need. If U.S. troops are killed or drawn into combat, an escalated war against Russia becomes the tool to get all the captured territory back. The outline is clear.

 

It doesn’t need to be Russia attacking U.S-led NATO troops,it only needs to be the impression of Russia attackingto create the horrific narrative. The global intelligence network is very skilled at creating the optics of conflict and assigning blame to the wrong actors. This is what they have done in the past in various regional conflicts in order to achieve the result.

 

One immediate way we can tell this isthe objective would be for various media to finally begin broadcastingdirectly from the line of conflict, the militarized zone that would divide Ukraine territory from Russia-controlled territory. Currently, the Ukraine war is the only regional warzone where there is literally no on-the-ground reporting by western media;that would change as part of the IC approach.

 

President Trump instinctively knows the Zelenskyy demand for U.S. troops as the security guarantee is dangerous; it pulls us deeper into the possibility of conflict. The U.S. industrial military complex would love to see our military involved in Ukraine, and the overwhelming membership of the U.S. political deep state also support it.

 

Without the USA, a false flag operation to frame the Russiansfor attacking EU troops does not carry the same weight. It is both alarming and maddening to accept this likely scenario scheming through the minds of those who have controlled the Ukraine mess for the past several years.

 

Thankfully, President Trump appears to be fundamentally against the proposition for U.S. military involvement.

 

We should be clear-eyed about what Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the bad actors are trying to create.

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/01/team-zelenskyy-has-a-security-guarantee-plan-to-recapture-all-lost-ukraine-territory/

 

Hell No, this is not going to happen

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 7:14 a.m. No.22686953   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6958 >>6971 >>7004 >>7010 >>7013

>>22686932

Zelenskyy Discusses Breakdown of White House Discussions –Nothing is Acceptable Unless USA Troops are Put Into Ukraine

 

March 1, 2025 | Sundance |

 

Zelenskyy appears for an interview with Bret Baier to discuss the collapse of discussions today at the White House.

 

Again and again, Zelenskyy outlines his view of “security guarantees” which includes the baseline component of USA troops on the ground.Zelenskyy will not accept any negotiations or ceasefire arrangement without U.S. troops in Ukraine.

 

This same “security guarantee” demand (U.S. Troops in Ukraine) applies also to the minerals guarantee. WATCH:

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/01/zelenskyy-discusses-breakdown-of-white-house-discussions-nothing-is-acceptable-unless-usa-troops-are-put-into-ukraine/

 

This is the proof of linked article and their plans to drag US in.

 

https://youtu.be/GfqLcBwUT_E

Anonymous ID: 4bddf7 March 2, 2025, 7:24 a.m. No.22687013   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22686953

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Breaks Down the Zelenskyy Nonsense, and Zelenskyy’s Refusal of a Ceasefire

March 1, 2025 | Sundance |

 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio carries the same level of frustration as his boss, President Donald Trump.

 

Appearing on CNN, Secretary Rubio outlines the background of weeks of opposition from the Ukraine leader as Zelenskyycontinually rejects a ceasefirediscussionwithout assurances the U.S. will put troopson the battlefield to secure the ceasefire.

 

From Zelenskyy’s continually expressed perspective, only if U.S. and NATO troops are at risk of being killed, is he willing to pause the combat to enter peace negotiations. These are the assurances, the “security guarantees” he demands. President Trump is not willing to put U.S. troops tenuously into place between Ukrainians and Russians; it would be foolish.

 

Secretary Rubio is strongly committed to the vision President Trump has, where killing stops so that peace negotiations can begin. Zelenskyy is not willing to accept a ceasefire, that’s the core problem. WATCH:

 

As previously stated,Zelenskyy is operating from a position where he believesthe CIA, global intelligence apparatus, NATO and the EU Commissionare willing to keep supporting and financing him.

 

https://youtu.be/P4MzGljlpr8

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/01/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-breaks-down-the-zelenskyy-nonsense-and-zelenskyys-refusal-of-a-ceasefire/

 

It sounds like Zelensky needs to be taken out of office for any peace.