>>2263988 PB

How about this:

Now do you understand why MIRRORS (R) and DISINFORMATION (R's "death") R necessary?

See how that works anon? CAN BE READ EITHER WAY.

So, let's use some logic:

Since MY WAY of reading it could be correct (50/50) and WE'VE (R board) found several DIRECT Q DROPS (LINKS) to suggest MY/OUR/R interpretation could be LEGIT, how about YOU expand YOUR thinking and allow LEGIT ANONS to dig in the direction they are feeling led to go?

Or does that "need to control others" which you (and others who've been screaming about "Rlarping") disavow in the loudest of manners, only apply when it's supportive of YOUR OWN VIEWS?

From the looks of it, and what we've been battling in terms of others coming over and trying to subvert our thread ("bakers" who prepare breads and leave all the notables behind while injecting their OWN RULES ABOUT WHO AND WHAT IS LEGIT IN THEIR OWN EYES) I'd have to conclude that there is much to be desired in terms of MUTUAL RESPECT for fellow anons within this board.

And THAT^^^ IS A SAD STATEMENT TO HAVE TO MAKE.

(PS. If there is a LEGIT, REAL ANON BAKER who would like to help our thread out, please respond over on our SIDE-BOARD. We'd appreciate it!)

>>2263659