>>2268431 previous bread

Last week, anon posted all the darkness dates and frequencies

I updated it here - https://pastebin.com/bdVE57UR

Longest darkness spans were - 9 days, 11 days, 19 days

Number of consecutive days in the dark spans, in order of occurrence:

1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 2, 1, 9, 3, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 6, 4, 1, 2, 1, 4, 3, 1, 11, 6, 3, 1, 19

Number of consecutive days in the light spans, in order of occurrence:

11, 7, 1, 6, 3, 12, 2, 5, 6, 2, 2, 7, 4, 12, 1, 4, 8, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 29, 1, 1, 10, 4, 1, 13, 6, 2, 1

The original did not make it to notables.

>>2269149

BAKER

Regarding the "Autist Notable" from the previous bake - this is incorrect, was not checked/sauced

▶Anonymous 07/24/18 (Tue) 17:22:42 0b21e8 (8) No.2268431

>newfag. Lurker.

>Need this baked or sauced or whatever.

>4.10.20

>There are blackout gaps that follow this sequence.

>4 day blackout - 3x

>10 day blackout - 2x

>20 day blackout - 1x

>3,2,1…

>3,2,1 BOOM

This ^ is incorrect and needs to reflect the actual numbers (below):

20 day blackout = Never happened. Only 19 days were dark, from 7/5 - 7/23; On the 20th day (today), Q posted

10 day blackout = Never happened. Only 9 days were dark, one time, from 12/26-1/3; On the 10th day (1/4), Q posted

4 day blackout = Only happened twice (not x4), from 3/11-3/14 and 3/24-3/27

I just updated the dark to light pastebin here - https://pastebin.com/bdVE57UR

>>2269800

ThankQ.

I was counting frequencies when this was updated, so please disregard the subsequent post regarding dark to light day counts.

>>2269832

Yes, it would. And we need to ensure our data regarding that is accurate. The original post claim had multiple errors and no attempt at verification was made. We need to do better than that. We cannot let anything slip.

>>2269882

The pastebin doc is EST and accurate. I checked it before making the update. I then updated it using EST. At this point, older anons are all on EST and understand the importance and relevancy of timestamps in EST.

>>2269889

Working on it……