ty anon
hey anon, right off the bat on bottom of page 9 I can see a big reason to not let this get to Supreme Court and I just got started reading. This case was about a denial on an application for a loaded hand gun. Young acted as his own attorney in this! Can we get a round of applause for this guy! Back to reading
pic labeled
young1 : would make Supreme Court addressing the constitutionality of all firearms and any other weapon
young2 : provides the Supreme Court the opportunity to revisit the Peruta (bad) decision with a correct and clear 2nd A decision
young3 : is trying to hold on the the Heller decision for narrowing purposes. ( Heller case was about having firearms in the home so that was the only question responded to, but the left is trying to hold on to it so they can say the Supreme Court MEANT you can ONLY have a loaded firearm in the house.)
Heller was not decided for that purpose and if this case was allowed to go to the Supreme Court, it would destroy their entire game plan of gun control! I KNEW THIS WAS FISHY! I haven't finished reading the opinion and don't see the need to continue unless anons need more info. The 9th ruled this way to keep this out of the Supreme Court's hands and deciding the 2nd A subject for the entire Country. This case only really matters for those being denied the right to carry a loaded hand gun. It basically abolishes the State's laws claiming you must have special circumstances in order to carry in public. The special circumstances recognized are for work or if you can show somehow you would be in imminent danger.