Anonymous ID: 33f02b March 6, 2025, 8:35 p.m. No.22717529   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7536 >>7547

>>22717519

AM Radio Static in Canada

AM radio in Canada, like in other regions, experiences static due to its susceptibility to interference from various sources. AM radio uses amplitude modulation, which means that any variation in the strength of the incoming signal is heard as audio, including unwanted noise from appliances, power lines, and electrical arcs.

This makes AM radio more prone to static compared to FM, which uses frequency modulation and is less affected by such interference.

 

Additionally, the ionosphere can cause interference, especially at night when AM signals can travel over long distances but also pick up more noise from distant sources.

The static can be exacerbated by the presence of electronic devices in homes and vehicles, which can generate electromagnetic interference.

 

In Canada, the adoption of HD Radio technology has been slower compared to the United States, potentially leaving more AM stations vulnerable to static and other forms of interference.

This technology could improve sound quality and reduce static, but its limited implementation means that many Canadians continue to experience static on AM radio.

 

Moreover, the aging infrastructure of AM radio transmitters and the potential for stations to move to FM frequencies could further impact the quality of AM radio broadcasts.

As car manufacturers plan to phase out AM radio in new models, particularly in electric vehicles, the future of AM radio in Canada remains uncertain.

 

Overall, the combination of technical limitations, interference from various sources, and the slow adoption of newer technologies contributes to the static experienced on AM radio in Canada.

Anonymous ID: 33f02b March 6, 2025, 8:35 p.m. No.22717532   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7533

Is there an attack on Canadians with Radiowaves in the AM band

There is no evidence to support the idea that there is a deliberate attack on Canadians using radiowaves in the AM band. The static and interference experienced on AM radio in Canada are primarily due to natural and technical factors, not malicious intent. Here are some common reasons for the static and interference:

 

Electromagnetic Interference (EMI): Household appliances, power lines, and other electrical devices can generate electromagnetic interference that affects AM radio signals.

Atmospheric Conditions: Weather conditions, such as thunderstorms, can cause static and interference on AM radio.

Ionosphere Effects: At night, the ionosphere can reflect AM radio signals over longer distances, leading to increased interference from distant stations.

Aging Infrastructure: Older and less well-maintained radio transmitters and receiving equipment can contribute to poorer signal quality.

Frequency Congestion: The AM band is often crowded with multiple stations, leading to interference, especially in urban areas.

HD Radio Adoption: The slower adoption of HD Radio technology in Canada means that many AM stations continue to use older, less robust broadcasting methods.

If you have concerns about specific interference or suspect malicious activity, you can report it to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) or other relevant authorities for investigation. However, the overwhelming evidence points to natural and technical causes rather than a targeted attack.

Anonymous ID: 33f02b March 6, 2025, 8:36 p.m. No.22717533   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7536 >>7547

>>22717532

Other Countires that are not at War with the Government have no problems with AM Radio

Found 5 relevant pages for: "countries with no AM radio interference issues despite no government conflict"

 

🌐

🌐

🌐

🌐

+1

Countries with no AM radio interference issues despite the absence of government conflict are not explicitly mentioned in the provided context. However, the context does discuss various scenarios where radio broadcasting faces challenges, such as jamming in North Korea and the historical context of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in communist countries.

 

For countries with stable governments and no significant interference issues, it is generally understood that well-regulated and maintained broadcasting systems contribute to minimal interference. Countries with robust regulatory frameworks and advanced broadcasting technologies, such as the United States, Canada, and many Western European nations, typically experience fewer AM radio interference issues.

 

If you are looking for specific examples or more detailed information, it would be beneficial to consult additional sources that focus on current broadcasting regulations and technologies in different countries.

Anonymous ID: 33f02b March 6, 2025, 8:39 p.m. No.22717536   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7547

>>22717529

>>22717533

Can goverments kill with Radiowaves

The use of radiowaves for lethal purposes is a complex and controversial topic. While it is theoretically possible to use electromagnetic radiation in ways that could cause harm, there is no widely accepted scientific evidence that governments are using radiowaves to kill people. Here are some key points to consider:

 

Non-Lethal Weapons: Some governments and military organizations have developed non-lethal weapons that use electromagnetic radiation. For example, the Active Denial System (ADS) uses millimeter-wave technology to create a sensation of heat on the skin, which is intended to disperse crowds without causing permanent injury. However, these systems are designed to be non-lethal and are subject to strict safety regulations.

Health Effects: High levels of electromagnetic radiation can cause thermal effects, such as burns and tissue damage, if the exposure is intense and prolonged. However, the use of such high levels of radiation in a targeted manner to cause death would be difficult to achieve without being detected and would likely violate international laws and ethical standards.

Regulatory and Ethical Constraints: The use of electromagnetic radiation for lethal purposes would likely be subject to significant regulatory and ethical constraints. International laws, such as the Geneva Conventions, prohibit the use of weapons that cause unnecessary suffering or are indiscriminate in their effects.

Scientific Evidence: There is no credible scientific evidence to support the claim that governments are using radiowaves to kill people. Claims of such activities are often categorized as conspiracy theories and lack empirical support.

Public Health Concerns: While there are ongoing debates about the long-term health effects of low-level electromagnetic radiation, such as from cell phones and Wi-Fi, these concerns are generally focused on potential non-thermal effects and are not related to the use of radiowaves as a lethal weapon.

If you have specific concerns or have come across information that suggests otherwise, it would be important to critically evaluate the sources and consult reputable scientific and governmental organizations for accurate information.