Anonymous ID: 8ad47d March 6, 2025, 6:12 p.m. No.22716921   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6926 >>7175 >>7377 >>7428 >>7475 >>7570

End Wokeness@EndWokeness

 

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D) falsely claims "80% of the most extreme crime in this country are from white supremacists"

 

3% of the U.S. are young black males

43% of all homicides are from them

 

Image

Dr. Carol Lunz,PhD,She/Her,HR Consultant Advocate

9:09 PM · Mar 6, 2025

·

1,485 Views

 

https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1897832046233256316

Anonymous ID: 8ad47d March 6, 2025, 9:02 p.m. No.22717608   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22717597

Per Grok

 

Naming conventions in Germany before, during, and after World War II reflect a mix of cultural traditions, historical influences, and societal shifts, including some peculiarities tied to the Nazi era. Let’s break it down:

Before WWII

Prior to the war, German naming was heavily influenced by tradition, religion, and regional customs. Children were often named after saints, family members, or historical figures. Multiple given names were common, with the first name (Rufname) being the one used in daily life, while others might honor relatives or religious significance. For example, "Johann Sebastian Bach" reflects this pattern—Johann as a common saint’s name, Sebastian as a secondary honorific.

Oddities? Not much stands out as "odd" by modern standards, but the rigidity of naming could be striking. The German state had long regulated names to some extent, requiring them to align with gender and avoid foreign or "un-German" elements. Unusual or invented names were rare, as tradition dominated.

During WWII (1933–1945)

The Nazi regime brought a distinct shift. Names became a tool for propaganda and ideology. Adolf Hitler’s government encouraged "Germanic" or "Aryan" names to reinforce racial purity myths. Old Germanic names like Siegfried, Brunhilde, or Wolfgang saw a resurgence, while Jewish or "non-German" names (e.g., Sarah, David) were stigmatized or outright banned for non-Jewish citizens to avoid confusion under racial laws. In 1938, the Nazis mandated that Jews add "Israel" or "Sara" as middle names if their first names weren’t explicitly Jewish, a chilling bureaucratic twist.

Parents sometimes named children after Nazi figures—Adolf spiked in popularity (no surprise there), with estimates suggesting a noticeable uptick in the 1930s and early 1940s. Names like Horst (from Horst Wessel, a Nazi "martyr") or even Reinhard (after Reinhard Heydrich) popped up too. It’s odd in hindsight how a regime weaponized something as personal as a name, turning it into a loyalty signal.

After WWII

Post-1945, naming shifted again as Germany reckoned with its past. "Adolf" plummeted in use—unsurprisingly, it became taboo, though it didn’t vanish entirely (some older Adolfs kept their names, but new ones were rare). The Allied occupation and later division into East and West Germany influenced trends. In West Germany, international names like Michael or Sabine crept in, reflecting American and European influence. In East Germany, Slavic names (e.g., Juri, Natasha) gained traction due to Soviet ties, which was a bit odd for a Germanic culture.

The state loosened its grip on naming rules over time, but quirks persisted. Germany still required names to indicate gender and avoid absurdity (e.g., "Moon Unit" wouldn’t fly). Courts occasionally stepped in—one famous case in the 1990s rejected "Pumuckl" (a cartoon character) as undignified. Compared to the Nazi era’s ideological naming, the postwar period felt like a deliberate pivot to normalcy, though with lingering legal oversight.

What’s Odd?

Nazi Influence: The brief surge of names tied to Hitler or Germanic mythology stands out as a creepy anomaly—imagine naming your kid after a dictator mid-reign.

 

Postwar Rejection: The near-total abandonment of Adolf as a name is a stark cultural marker, rare in how quickly it flipped from common to toxic.

 

Legal Continuity: Germany’s obsession with regulating names, from banning "un-German" ones prewar to rejecting quirky ones postwar, is unusual compared to freer systems like the U.S.